Frying Pan Nonstick 20 24 28cm Frying Pan with Ceramic Titanium Coating Round Copper Egg Pan vs Stainless Clad Fry Pan: which is safer?
Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. LMETJMA Frying Pan Nonstick 20 24 28cm Frying Pan with Ceramic Titanium Coating Round Copper Egg Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
LMETJMA
Frying Pan Nonstick 20 24 28cm Frying Pan with Ceramic Titanium Coating Round Copper Egg Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-type coating or undisclosed fluorochemical in binder (PFAS proxy)
LikelyCoating degradation and particulate release
PossibleAluminum leaching (if coating fails)
Our pick
Made In
Stainless Clad Fry Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleClad separation or delamination over time
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PTFE or undisclosed fluorochemical in binder (PFAS proxy), Coating degradation and particulate release, Aluminum leaching (if coating fails) and Thermal fume risk from overheating on the LMETJMA and not on the Made In.
- We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the LMETJMA.
- The LMETJMA is Ceramic-titanium nonstick coating (unspecified composition) where the Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the LMETJMA grade, at 35% confidence against 90%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cookware: see the full ranking