Stainless Clad Fry Pan vs Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan: which is safer?
Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Made In
Stainless Clad Fry Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleClad separation or delamination over time
Mirro
Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAluminum leaching
ReportedCeramic coating degradation and microchipping
PossibleTeflon-type coating or undisclosed nonstick binders
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Mirro.
- We flag Aluminum leaching, Ceramic coating degradation and microchipping and PTFE or undisclosed nonstick binders on the Mirro and not on the Made In.
- The Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating where the Mirro is aluminum with ceramic nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cookware, see the full ranking