Stainless Clad Fry Pan vs Ceramic Nonstick Square Grill Pan: which is safer?

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. Neoflam Ceramic Nonstick Square Grill Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating

Confidence

90%

PossibleClad separation or delamination over time

Neoflam Ceramic Nonstick Square Grill Pan

Neoflam

Ceramic Nonstick Square Grill Pan

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 3/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

ceramic nonstick coating over steel base

Confidence

62%

PossibleCeramic coating durability and degradation

PossibleCoating-to-steel interface corrosion or leaching

PossibleCeramic coating resin components (silicone, epoxy, or other binders)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Neoflam.
  • We flag Ceramic coating durability and degradation, Coating-to-steel interface corrosion or leaching and Ceramic coating resin components (silicone, epoxy, or other binders) on the Neoflam and not on the Made In.
  • The Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating where the Neoflam is ceramic nonstick coating over steel base, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Neoflam grade, at 62% confidence against 90%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware: see the full ranking