Stainless Clad Fry Pan vs Vulcan Ivory 11" Nonstick Frying Wok: which is safer?

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. Neoflam Vulcan Ivory 11" Nonstick Frying Wok carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating

Confidence

90%

PossibleClad separation or delamination over time

Neoflam Vulcan Ivory 11" Nonstick Frying Wok

Neoflam

Vulcan Ivory 11" Nonstick Frying Wok

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nonstick coating, composition not disclosed

Confidence

35%

PossibleNonstick coating degradation and fume risk

PossibleAluminum substrate leaching

ReportedCoating composition and long-term safety unknown

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Neoflam.
  • We flag Nonstick coating degradation and fume risk, Aluminum substrate leaching and Coating composition and long-term safety unknown on the Neoflam and not on the Made In.
  • The Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating where the Neoflam is Nonstick coating, composition not disclosed, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Neoflam grade, at 35% confidence against 90%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware: see the full ranking