Xcelerate Pro 2 Warm-Moly 50g vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Maplus
Xcelerate Pro 2 Warm-Moly 50g
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleMolybdenum particulate inhalation
PossibleDermal irritation or allergic contact
PossibleThermal degradation of hydrocarbon blend
Our pick
Star Ski Wax
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor
PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis
PossibleIngestion risk in children
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Molybdenum particulate inhalation, Dermal irritation or allergic contact and Thermal degradation of hydrocarbon blend on the Maplus and not on the Star Ski Wax.
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the Maplus.
- The Maplus is Ski/snowboard wax blend with molybdenum additive where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking