Tour S Golf Balls vs Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls: which is safer?
Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Maxfli
Tour S Golf Balls
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Synthetic rubber core with surlyn or urethane cover
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from cover wear
PossibleResidual mold or bacterial growth in storage
Our pick
Nike Golf
Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding from cover wear and Residual mold or bacterial growth in storage on the Maxfli and not on the Nike Golf.
- We flag Microplastic shedding on the Nike Golf and not on the Maxfli.
- The Maxfli is Synthetic rubber core with surlyn or urethane cover where the Nike Golf is Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More golf balls & equipment: see the full ranking