Flavor Snacks Dog Biscuits vs Sensitive Skin Stomach Salmon Rice Dry Dog Food: which is safer?
Milk-Bone Flavor Snacks Dog Biscuits is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Milk-Bone
Flavor Snacks Dog Biscuits
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Wheat flour, meat by-products, soy lecithin, standard binders and preservatives
Confidence
78%
PossibleRancidity and oxidative degradation of fats
ReportedIngredient sourcing transparency and traceability
Purina Pro Plan
Sensitive Skin Stomach Salmon Rice Dry Dog Food
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Paper/kraft bag with possible grease-resistant interior coating (unspecified)
Confidence
62%
PossibleUnidentified interior coating composition
PossibleMoisture-driven bag degradation and mold risk
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Rancidity and oxidative degradation of fats and Ingredient sourcing transparency and traceability on the Milk-Bone and not on the Purina Pro Plan.
- We flag Unidentified interior coating composition and Moisture-driven bag degradation and mold risk on the Purina Pro Plan and not on the Milk-Bone.
- The Milk-Bone is Wheat flour, meat by-products, soy lecithin, standard binders and preservatives where the Purina Pro Plan is Paper/kraft bag with possible grease-resistant interior coating (unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More pet food bags, see the full ranking