Path Hybrid Smartwatch vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?

Misfit Path Hybrid Smartwatch is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Misfit Path Hybrid Smartwatch

Misfit

Path Hybrid Smartwatch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Stainless steel case, elastomer band

Confidence

35%

PossibleElastomer band degradation and skin contact

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel

X-Doria Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

X-Doria

Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel, magnetic closure

Confidence

82%

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Elastomer band degradation and skin contact on the Misfit and not on the X-Doria.
  • Both carry a flag for Nickel leaching from stainless steel, so neither choice avoids it.
  • The Misfit is Stainless steel case, elastomer band where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Misfit grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking