Eco-Wax All-Temp Hot Wax vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

mountainFLOW

Eco-Wax All-Temp Hot Wax

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

wax blend, composition not disclosed

Confidence

45%

LikelyInhalation hazard from wax dust and vapors

PossibleUndisclosed additive contamination

ReportedCoating degradation and base damage if misapplied

Our pick

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

Star Ski Wax

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated)

Confidence

78%

PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor

PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis

PossibleIngestion risk in children

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Inhalation hazard from wax dust and vapors, Undisclosed additive contamination, Coating degradation and base damage if misapplied and PFAS in wax formulation on the mountainFLOW and not on the Star Ski Wax.
  • We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the mountainFLOW.
  • The mountainFLOW is wax blend, composition not disclosed where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • We are less certain about the mountainFLOW grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking