Eco-Wax Skin Wax vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

mountainFLOW

Eco-Wax Skin Wax

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

wax blend, composition unspecified

Confidence

45%

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

PossiblePFAS in wax or processing aids

Our pick

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

Star Ski Wax

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated)

Confidence

78%

PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor

PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis

PossibleIngestion risk in children

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers and PFAS in wax or processing aids on the mountainFLOW and not on the Star Ski Wax.
  • We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the mountainFLOW.
  • The mountainFLOW is wax blend, composition unspecified where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • We are less certain about the mountainFLOW grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking