Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes vs Velocity Nitro WTR Men's Running Shoes: which is safer?
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
New Balance
Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and color-based toxins
PossibleAntimony in polyester
Puma
Velocity Nitro WTR Men's Running Shoes
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and potential leachates
PossibleAntimony in polyester and synthetic blends
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from synthetic mesh wear
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and color-based toxins and Antimony in polyester on the New Balance and not on the Puma.
- We flag DWR coating degradation and potential leachates, Antimony in polyester and synthetic blends and Microplastic shedding from synthetic mesh wear on the Puma and not on the New Balance.
- The New Balance is Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole where the Puma is Synthetic mesh/knit upper with DWR-treated waterproof coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the New Balance is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Puma grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More running & athletic shoes: see the full ranking