Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes vs Women's Running Shoes Saucony Triumph 23 GTX: which is safer?

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and color-based toxins

PossibleAntimony in polyester

Women's Running Shoes Saucony Triumph 23 GTX

Saucony

Women's Running Shoes Saucony Triumph 23 GTX

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

textile upper with Gore-Tex GTX waterproof membrane

Confidence

45%

PossibleFormaldehyde in textile resins and dyes

PossibleAzo dyes in colored textiles

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and color-based toxins and Antimony in polyester on the New Balance and not on the Saucony.
  • We flag Formaldehyde in textile resins and dyes, Azo dyes in colored textiles, Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing and Gore-Tex membrane durability and delamination on the Saucony and not on the New Balance.
  • The New Balance is Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole where the Saucony is textile upper with Gore-Tex GTX waterproof membrane, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the New Balance is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Saucony grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More running & athletic shoes: see the full ranking