Men's Yulex Regulator Lite Front-Zip Full Wetsuit vs Men's Comp Full Wetsuit: which is safer?
Patagonia Men's Yulex Regulator Lite Front-Zip Full Wetsuit is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Patagonia
Men's Yulex Regulator Lite Front-Zip Full Wetsuit
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
analysis pending
Verdict
pending
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Yulex (synthetic rubber, PTMEG-based), neoprene-free
Confidence
72%
Xcel
Men's Comp Full Wetsuit
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 12/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Neoprene/rubber wetsuit with water-repellent coating
Confidence
42%
Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (undisclosed)
PossibleSkin irritation from residual coatings or accelerators
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating chemistry (undisclosed) and Skin irritation from residual coatings or accelerators on the Xcel and not on the Patagonia.
- The Patagonia is Yulex (synthetic rubber, PTMEG-based), neoprene-free where the Xcel is Neoprene/rubber wetsuit with DWR coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Xcel grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More wetsuits: see the full ranking