Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top vs Michelle Reversible One-Piece: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Solid & Striped Michelle Reversible One-Piece carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Solid & Striped Michelle Reversible One-Piece

Solid & Striped

Michelle Reversible One-Piece

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon/polyamide blend swimwear

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant safety

PossibleFormaldehyde in dye auxiliaries or finishing resins

PossibleWater-repellent (water-repellent coating) treatment chemistry

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Solid & Striped.
  • We flag Azo dyes and colorant safety, Formaldehyde in dye auxiliaries or finishing resins and Water-repellent (DWR) treatment chemistry on the Solid & Striped and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear) where the Solid & Striped is Nylon/polyamide blend swimwear, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear: see the full ranking