Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket vs Men's Pearl Izumi Attack WXB Jacket: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals
Pearl Izumi
Men's Pearl Izumi Attack WXB Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating finish
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finish or sizing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, DWR coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals and Unverified DWR chemistry on the Patagonia and not on the Pearl Izumi.
- We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Formaldehyde resins in finish or sizing and Microplastic shedding from degraded coating on the Pearl Izumi and not on the Patagonia.
- Both carry a flag for Antimony in polyester fiber, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Patagonia is polyester shell with DWR finish where the Pearl Izumi is Polyester with water-repellent (DWR) treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Pearl Izumi grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cycling rain jackets: see the full ranking