Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket vs Obsidian Women's Wind Jacket: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals
Primal
Obsidian Women's Wind Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating finish chemistry (fluorine content unspecified)
Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and shedding microparticles
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, Antimony in polyester fiber, DWR coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals and Unverified DWR chemistry on the Patagonia and not on the Primal.
- We flag DWR finish chemistry (fluorine content unspecified) and DWR coating degradation and shedding microparticles on the Primal and not on the Patagonia.
- The Patagonia is polyester shell with DWR finish where the Primal is Synthetic fabric with DWR finish (unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Primal grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cycling rain jackets: see the full ranking