Loop Smart Screen-Free Wearable Health Band vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Polar
Loop Smart Screen-Free Wearable Health Band
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 5
Material
Elastomer band
Confidence
35%
PossibleElastomer additives (colorants, antioxidants, plasticizers)
PossibleAllergenic dyes or pigments in band coloring
PossibleBacterial or fungal growth in band crevices
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel, magnetic closure
Confidence
82%
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Elastomer additives (colorants, antioxidants, plasticizers), Allergenic dyes or pigments in band coloring, Bacterial or fungal growth in band crevices and Thermal degradation of elastomer when overheated on the Polar and not on the X-Doria.
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Polar.
- The Polar is Elastomer band where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Polar grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking