Vacuum Insulated Travel Mug with Handle vs Rambler 24 oz Mug with Ceramic Lining: which is safer?

Rambler 24 oz Mug with Ceramic Lining is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

S'well Vacuum Insulated Travel Mug with Handle

S'well

Vacuum Insulated Travel Mug with Handle

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Poor 48/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Stainless steel body, plastic handle and cap

Confidence

72%

PossiblePlastic cap/handle thermal migration

PossibleUndisclosed polymer type and additives in handle/cap

PossibleVacuum seal degradation and mold growth

Our pick

Yeti

Rambler 24 oz Mug with Ceramic Lining

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

stainless steel exterior, ceramic lining interior

Confidence

72%

PossibleCeramic coating degradation over time

PossibleBacterial growth in crevices or damaged coating

PossibleThermal shock or fracture

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Plastic cap/handle thermal migration, Undisclosed polymer type and additives in handle/cap, Vacuum seal degradation and mold growth and No third-party safety or PFAS testing disclosed on the S'well and not on the Yeti.
  • We flag Ceramic coating degradation over time, Bacterial growth in crevices or damaged coating and Thermal shock or fracture on the Yeti and not on the S'well.
  • The S'well is Stainless steel body, plastic handle and cap where the Yeti is stainless steel exterior, ceramic lining interior, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More insulated travel mugs, see the full ranking