Galaxy Watch FE vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Samsung
Galaxy Watch FE
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Stainless steel case, elastomer band
Confidence
35%
PossibleElastomer band degradation and microfragmentation
PossibleBacterial or fungal colonization in band crevices
PossibleNickel in stainless steel case
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel, magnetic closure
Confidence
82%
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Elastomer band degradation and microfragmentation, Bacterial or fungal colonization in band crevices and Nickel in stainless steel case on the Samsung and not on the X-Doria.
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Samsung.
- The Samsung is Stainless steel case, elastomer band where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Samsung grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking