Galaxy Watch Ultra2 vs Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Samsung
Galaxy Watch Ultra2
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleElastomer band bacterial growth and odor
PossibleElastomer degradation and microplastic shedding
PossibleSkin sensitization from elastomer additives
Swatch
Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleResin band VOC off-gassing
PossibleResin band degradation over time
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel case
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Elastomer band bacterial growth and odor, Elastomer degradation and microplastic shedding and Skin sensitization from elastomer additives on the Samsung and not on the Swatch.
- We flag Resin band VOC off-gassing, Resin band degradation over time and Nickel leaching from stainless steel case on the Swatch and not on the Samsung.
- The Samsung is Stainless steel case, sapphire crystal, elastomer band where the Swatch is Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Samsung grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof smartphone cases, see the full ranking