Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G vs UR6 Blue Bio Training Wax: which is safer?
Swix UR6 Blue Bio Training Wax is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Star Ski Wax
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 88/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated)
Confidence
78%
PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor
PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis
PossibleIngestion risk in children
Our pick
Swix
UR6 Blue Bio Training Wax
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 92/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Bio-based paraffin blend wax
Confidence
72%
PossibleCombustion/heating fume inhalation
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the Swix.
- We flag Combustion/heating fume inhalation and Microplastic shedding during use on the Swix and not on the Star Ski Wax.
- The Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated) where the Swix is Bio-based paraffin blend wax, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking