Jester Luxe Backpack vs Recon Backpack: which is safer?

The North Face Jester Luxe Backpack is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

The North Face Jester Luxe Backpack

The North Face

Jester Luxe Backpack

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating composition (PFAS candidate)

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

The North Face Recon Backpack

The North Face

Recon Backpack

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating water-resistant treatment

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and leaching

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from materials and adhesives

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating treatment

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating composition (PFAS candidate) and Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers on the The North Face and not on the The North Face.
  • We flag DWR coating degradation and leaching, Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from materials and adhesives and PFAS in DWR treatment on the The North Face and not on the The North Face.
  • The The North Face is Nylon/polyester with durable water-repellent (DWR) coating where the The North Face is nylon/polyester blend with DWR water-resistant treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More backpacks: see the full ranking