Ua All Weather Golf Glove 6001271 vs Men's Profile Complete Golf Set: which is safer?
Wilson Men's Profile Complete Golf Set is the clear pick. Ua All Weather Golf Glove 6001271 carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Under Armour
Ua All Weather Golf Glove 6001271
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating composition (likely PFAS)
PossiblePolyurethane degradation and off-gassing
PossibleSkin irritation from undisclosed additives
Our pick
Wilson
Men's Profile Complete Golf Set
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleGraphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
PossibleRubber grip deterioration and skin contact
PossibleNickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating composition (likely PFAS), Polyurethane degradation and off-gassing and Skin irritation from undisclosed additives on the Under Armour and not on the Wilson.
- We flag Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure, Rubber grip deterioration and skin contact and Nickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads on the Wilson and not on the Under Armour.
- The Under Armour is synthetic leather or polyurethane with DWR finish where the Wilson is Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Wilson is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More golf balls & equipment, see the full ranking