Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch vs Raptic Citizen Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure Apple Watch Band: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

X-Doria Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

X-Doria

Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel, magnetic closure

Confidence

82%

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel

X-Doria Raptic Citizen Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure Apple Watch Band

X-Doria

Raptic Citizen Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure Apple Watch Band

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Stainless steel band, magnetic closure

Confidence

78%

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel

PossibleContact dermatitis from closure mechanism materials

PossibleBacterial/biofilm accumulation at band-watch junction

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Contact dermatitis from closure mechanism materials and Bacterial/biofilm accumulation at band-watch junction on the X-Doria and not on the X-Doria.
  • Both carry a flag for Nickel leaching from stainless steel, so neither choice avoids it.
  • The X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure where the X-Doria is Stainless steel band, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking