Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch vs Redmi Watch 5 Active Smartwatch: which is safer?
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5 Active Smartwatch is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel, magnetic closure
Confidence
82%
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Our pick
Xiaomi
Redmi Watch 5 Active Smartwatch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 69/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Plastic case, glass display, stainless steel band
Confidence
35%
PossiblePlastic degradation and microplastic shedding
PossibleBattery leakage and electrolyte exposure
PossibleAdhesive outgassing or skin contact irritation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Xiaomi.
- We flag Plastic degradation and microplastic shedding, Battery leakage and electrolyte exposure, Adhesive outgassing or skin contact irritation and Nickel or cobalt allergy from stainless steel band on the Xiaomi and not on the X-Doria.
- The X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure where the Xiaomi is Plastic case, glass display, stainless steel band, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Xiaomi grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking