Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch vs Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar: which is safer?
Xiaomi Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel, magnetic closure
Confidence
82%
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Our pick
Xiaomi
Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Unspecified polymers, likely silicone and stainless steel band; 50m
Confidence
35%
PossibleWater resistance seal failure and bacterial/mold growth
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Xiaomi.
- We flag Water resistance seal failure and bacterial/mold growth on the Xiaomi and not on the X-Doria.
- The X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure where the Xiaomi is Unspecified polymers, likely silicone and stainless steel band; 50m, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Xiaomi grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking