1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane, CAS 354-33-6

2 companies have told Minnesota that this compound is intentionally added to 3 of their products, in 4 filings across 2 components. Each row names the product, where in it the compound sits and what it is there to do.

Disclosures
4
Companies
2
Products
3
CAS number
354-33-6

All 4 filings

Cascade System Environmental ChamberESPEC North America, Inc.ESPEC North America, Inc.
Where in the product,
Refrigerant R449a
What it is doing,
Extreme temperature stability
Compound,
1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS 354-33-6)
How much the filer reports,
150,000 ppm to <300,000 ppm (30%)

Model Code Descriptor Ends in X/Z · Minnesota disclosure MN-PXQJEK3 · published 2026-08-25

Single Stage Environnmental ChamberESPEC North America, Inc.ESPEC North America, Inc.
Where in the product,
Refrigerant R449a
What it is doing,
Extreme temperature stability
Compound,
1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS 354-33-6)
How much the filer reports,
150,000 ppm to <300,000 ppm (30%)

Model Code Descriptor Ends in U/L · Minnesota disclosure MN-PXQJEK3 · published 2026-08-25

Liebert DSVertivVertiv Holdings Co.
Where in the product,
Gasses and Refrigerants
What it is doing,
Refrigerants
Compound,
1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS 354-33-6)
How much the filer reports,
150,000 ppm to <300,000 ppm (30%)

SKU VS042KDA1EI9GYS · Minnesota disclosure MN-NXWFSYX · published 2026-09-30

Liebert DSVertivVertiv Holdings Co.
Where in the product,
Gasses and Refrigerants
What it is doing,
Refrigerants
Compound,
1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS 354-33-6)
How much the filer reports,
150,000 ppm to <300,000 ppm (30%)

SKU VS105KVA0EI9GAS · Minnesota disclosure MN-NXWFSYX · published 2026-09-30

Other compounds in the filings

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.