2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7-dodecafluoroheptanoic acid, CAS 1546-95-8

1 company has told Minnesota that this compound is intentionally added to 5 of their products, in 5 filings across 2 components. Each row names the product, where in it the compound sits and what it is there to do.

Disclosures
5
Companies
1
Products
5
CAS number
1546-95-8

All 5 filings

Nutrition Scale seriesCOSORIVesync (US) corporation
Where in the product,
battery
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
How much the filer reports,
Practical Detection Limit to <100 ppm

HTS 8423.10.0010 · Minnesota disclosure MN-PKKUN43 · published 2026-09-30

Kitchen Scale seriesEtekcityVesync (US) corporation
Where in the product,
Battery
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
How much the filer reports,
Practical Detection Limit to <100 ppm

HTS 8423.10.0010 · Minnesota disclosure MN-PKKUN43 · published 2026-09-30

Luggage Scale seriesEtekcityVesync (US) corporation
Where in the product,
Battery
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
How much the filer reports,
Practical Detection Limit to <100 ppm

HTS 8423.10.0010 · Minnesota disclosure MN-PKKUN43 · published 2026-09-30

Weight Scale seriesEtekcityVesync (US) corporation
Where in the product,
Battery
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
How much the filer reports,
Practical Detection Limit to <100 ppm

HTS 8423.10.0010 · Minnesota disclosure MN-PKKUN43 · published 2026-09-30

Various fan seriesLevoitVesync (US) corporation
Where in the product,
battery
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
How much the filer reports,
Practical Detection Limit to <100 ppm

HTS 8414.51.9090 · Minnesota disclosure MN-PKKUN43 · published 2026-09-30

Other compounds in the filings

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.