2,4,6-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-1,3,5,2,4,6-trioxatrisilinane, CAS 2374-14-3
2 companies have told Minnesota that this compound is intentionally added to 2 of their products, in 2 filings across 2 components. Each row names the product, where in it the compound sits and what it is there to do.
- Disclosures
- 2
- Companies
- 2
- Products
- 2
- CAS number
- 2374-14-3
How much is reported
Concentration bands as filed, heaviest declared first, with filings that give no concentration at the bottom. Counts are of filings, since one product can report more than one compound.
- 150,000 ppm to <300,000 ppm (30%)1 filing
- 1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)1 filing
All 2 filings
- Where in the product,
- water valve
- What it is doing,
- Intermediate
- Compound,
- 2,4,6-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-1,3,5,2,4,6-trioxatrisilinane (CAS 2374-14-3)
- How much the filer reports,
- 150,000 ppm to <300,000 ppm (30%)
HTS 8509.80.5070 · Minnesota disclosure MN-PKKUN43 · published 2026-09-30
- Where in the product,
- Base Resin Pellet Formulation
- What it is doing,
- Chemical/Fuel/Oil Resistance
- Compound,
- 2,4,6-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-1,3,5,2,4,6-trioxatrisilinane (CAS 2374-14-3)
- How much the filer reports,
- 1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)
SKU FO2004915360 · Minnesota disclosure MN-2I698N1 · published 2026-09-29
Other compounds in the filings
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE)14,002
- Ethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-, homopolymer12,349
- Fluoropolymers10,203
- poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (VDF-co-HFP (FKM 1))5,191
- potassium 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane-1-sulfonate2,420
- PFAS Present but unknown at this time2,305
- 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoro-, polymer with 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethene1,214
- Methyl(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)silanone1,213
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) (FEP)1,187
- 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymd.1,115
- 1,1-Difluoretylen-hexafluorpropenpolymer986
- Ethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-, oxidized, polymd777
Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.