ethene, tetrafluoro-, polymer with ethene, CAS 25038-71-5

2 companies have told Minnesota that this compound is intentionally added to 4 of their products, in 4 filings across 4 components. 3 of those filings report the part is 90 to 100% this compound by mass. Each row names the product, where in it the compound sits and what it is there to do.

Disclosures
4
Companies
2
Products
4
CAS number
25038-71-5

How much is reported

Concentration bands as filed, heaviest declared first, with filings that give no concentration at the bottom. Counts are of filings, since one product can report more than one compound.

  • 90 to 100%3 filings
  • 1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)1 filing

All 4 filings

LIP SEAL 473444V/ VITONAFT - Pioneer AftermarketFranklin Electric
Where in the product,
30500120
What it is doing,
Chemical/Fuel/Oil Resistance
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

SKU 30500120 · Minnesota disclosure MN-FEDZZ2P · published 2026-08-25

LIP SEAL 476470V VITONAFT - Pioneer AftermarketFranklin Electric
Where in the product,
30500172
What it is doing,
Chemical/Fuel/Oil Resistance
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

SKU 30500172 · Minnesota disclosure MN-FEDZZ2P · published 2026-08-25

LIP SEAL CR26177 VITONAFT - Pioneer AftermarketFranklin Electric
Where in the product,
30500130
What it is doing,
Chemical/Fuel/Oil Resistance
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

SKU 30500130 · Minnesota disclosure MN-FEDZZ2P · published 2026-08-25

Bose Smart Ultra SoundbarBose CorporationBose Corporation
Where in the product,
Transformer
What it is doing,
Insulators
How much the filer reports,
1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)

SKU 882963-XXXX · Minnesota disclosure MN-PQCRJP7 · published 2026-04-09

Other compounds in the filings

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.