Nexgrill Industries, Inc. and PFAS, what the company told Minnesota

Nexgrill Industries, Inc. has filed 5 PFAS disclosures with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, covering 1 product and naming 5 distinct compounds across 1 component. Everything below is the company’s own statement to a regulator, not our assessment.

Disclosures filed
5
Products covered
1
Compounds named
5
Declared uses
2

All 5 filings

Stone Island 12-Burner Gas GrillKirkland Signature (Costco)
Where in the product,
PCB of LED-illuinated control knob
What it is doing,
Flame retardant
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

SKU 2327691 · Minnesota disclosure MN-K62DYNC · published 2026-04-20

Stone Island 12-Burner Gas GrillKirkland Signature (Costco)
Where in the product,
PCB of LED-illuinated control knob
What it is doing,
Flame retardant
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

SKU 2327691 · Minnesota disclosure MN-K62DYNC · published 2026-04-20

Stone Island 12-Burner Gas GrillKirkland Signature (Costco)
Where in the product,
PCB of LED-illuinated control knob
What it is doing,
Stabilizing agent
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

SKU 2327691 · Minnesota disclosure MN-K62DYNC · published 2026-04-20

Stone Island 12-Burner Gas GrillKirkland Signature (Costco)
Where in the product,
PCB of LED-illuinated control knob
What it is doing,
Stabilizing agent
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

SKU 2327691 · Minnesota disclosure MN-K62DYNC · published 2026-04-20

Stone Island 12-Burner Gas GrillKirkland Signature (Costco)
Where in the product,
PCB of LED-illuinated control knob
What it is doing,
Flame retardant
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

SKU 2327691 · Minnesota disclosure MN-K62DYNC · published 2026-04-20

Other companies that have filed

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.