2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,9-heptadecafluorononanoic acid, CAS 375-95-1

3 companies have told Minnesota that this compound is intentionally added to 4 of their products, in 4 filings across 3 components. Each row names the product, where in it the compound sits and what it is there to do.

Disclosures
4
Companies
3
Products
4
CAS number
375-95-1

How much is reported

Concentration bands as filed, heaviest declared first, with filings that give no concentration at the bottom. Counts are of filings, since one product can report more than one compound.

  • 1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)2 filings
  • 100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)2 filings

All 4 filings

DOUBLE INTERSTICE SCCMFIN - InconFranklin Electric
Where in the product,
282-0240
What it is doing,
Chemical/Fuel/Oil Resistance
How much the filer reports,
1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)

SKU TS-SCCM/2 · Minnesota disclosure MN-FEDZZ2P · published 2026-08-25

SINGLE INTERSTICE SCCMFIN - InconFranklin Electric
Where in the product,
282-0240
What it is doing,
Chemical/Fuel/Oil Resistance
How much the filer reports,
1,000 ppm to <10,000 ppm (1%)

SKU TS-SCCM/1 · Minnesota disclosure MN-FEDZZ2P · published 2026-08-25

Stone Island 12-Burner Gas GrillKirkland Signature (Costco)Nexgrill Industries, Inc.
Where in the product,
PCB of LED-illuinated control knob
What it is doing,
Stabilizing agent
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

SKU 2327691 · Minnesota disclosure MN-K62DYNC · published 2026-04-20

431XEU-NASQNAP Systems, Inc.QNAP Inc.
Where in the product,
Packaging material (SUNTECC / 32102-043400-100-RS)
What it is doing,
Anti-static agent
How much the filer reports,
100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)

UPC 885022016792 · Minnesota disclosure MN-6UGBB8E · published 2026-09-29

Other compounds in the filings

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.