PFAS in All-Purpose Cleaner, Which Brands Grade Best and Worst

Based on available materials and data, the all-purpose cleaner category grades better overall than most PFAS-scrutinized product categories, but the spread between the top and bottom performers is still wide. Among the products in our database Biokleen All Purpose Cleaner Concentrate Branch Basics The Concentrate Branch Basics All-Purpose Spray, and Grove Collaborative Multi-Purpose Cleaner Concentrate each earned our model's top grade of Excellent with a 100 out of 100 safety score, the highest rating our system currently assigns in this category.

This guide ranks every all-purpose cleaner currently graded in our database, explains what separates an Excellent 100 from an Excellent 75, and flags the formulation and packaging details that tend to drag scores down elsewhere in the cleaning aisle. None of the products reviewed here carry a flagged or poor PFAS grade in our system, which is itself notable since many household categories, from carpets and rugs to waterproof boots, show much more variability. Still, "Excellent" is a relative grade built from our model's reading of ingredient disclosures and packaging claims, not a laboratory certification, so we break down exactly what's behind each score below.

Summary comparison

Product	PFAS grade	Safety score	Verdict
Biokleen All Purpose Cleaner Concentrate	Excellent	100/100	Top-graded concentrate, lower concern per reviewed materials
Branch Basics The Concentrate	Excellent	100/100	Top-graded, transparent multi-use concentrate system
Branch Basics All-Purpose Spray	Excellent	100/100	Ready-to-use sibling of the Concentrate, same formulation base
Grove Collaborative Multi-Purpose Cleaner Concentrate	Excellent	100/100	Top-graded, concentrate format reduces packaging footprint
Blueland Toilet Cleaner Tablets	Excellent	85/100	Strong grade, slightly lower than the top tier on disclosure depth
Biokleen Spray and Wipe All Purpose Cleaner	Excellent	75/100	Solid grade, ready-to-use format scores lower than the concentrate line
Truly Free Everyday Cleaner	Excellent	75/100	Solid grade, good general-purpose option in reviewed data

How we're grading "Excellent" here, and why scores still differ

Every product on this list carries our model's Excellent label, but the scores range from 75 to 100. That spread matters. Our grading system weighs ingredient transparency, the presence or absence of fluorinated surfactants and stain-repellent agents in disclosed formulations, packaging type, and how specific a brand's own claims are. A 100 reflects that, based on available materials and data, our model found no evidence of PFAS-associated ingredients or red-flag chemical classes in the disclosed formulation, combined with higher transparency. A 75 still clears our bar for Excellent but reflects either less granular public disclosure or a formulation category where our model applies more conservative assumptions. None of these numbers are lab-verified PFAS test results unless explicitly stated by a third party; they are model-based estimates built from publicly available ingredient lists, safety data sheets, and brand statements.

The top tier, four products at 100/100

Biokleen All Purpose Cleaner Concentrate

Materials and format. A plant-derived, concentrated liquid cleaner sold in a formula that the brand positions as free from several classes of synthetic additives commonly scrutinized in household cleaners. Concentrates generally score well in our model because they reduce the plastic packaging footprint per use and often carry more detailed ingredient disclosure to justify premium concentrate pricing.

Brand claims vs. verified. Biokleen states its formulas avoid a list of flagged chemical classes. This is a brand-stated claim. Our grading reflects that, based on reviewed materials, no PFAS-associated ingredients were identified, not that a third-party lab confirmed zero PFAS content.

Pros. Concentrate format, detailed public ingredient list, consistent brand transparency across its product line, top model score.

Cons. Requires dilution, which some users find less convenient than ready-to-use sprays. As with any model-based estimate, the absence of evidence is not the same as independent lab confirmation.

Branch Basics The Concentrate

Materials and format. A single concentrated base formula marketed for multiple cleaning uses once diluted into labeled bottles. The brand built its identity around minimalist, disclosed ingredient sourcing.

Brand claims vs. verified. Branch Basics publishes a full ingredient list and markets the product as free of several irritant and additive classes. These are brand statements. Our Excellent grade and 100 score reflect that reviewed materials showed no evidence of PFAS, which is a model-based estimate from public disclosure rather than a certified lab result.

Pros. High transparency, multi-use concentrate reduces packaging waste, consistent formulation across the product family including the companion spray below.

Cons. Premium price point relative to conventional big-box cleaners. Dilution system has a learning curve for new users.

Branch Basics All-Purpose Spray

Materials and format. The ready-to-use counterpart to The Concentrate, pre-diluted into a spray bottle format for direct application on counters and surfaces.

Brand claims vs. verified. Same formulation base and brand claims as The Concentrate above. Our model assigns the same 100/100 score since the underlying formula and disclosed ingredients match.

Pros. Convenience of a ready-to-use spray without diluting, same transparency profile as the concentrate line, top model grade.

Cons. Costs more per ounce than buying The Concentrate and diluting it yourself. Plastic spray bottle adds packaging compared to the concentrate format.

Grove Collaborative Multi-Purpose Cleaner Concentrate

Materials and format. A concentrated multi-purpose formula sold through Grove's sustainability-focused retail platform, designed to be diluted into reusable bottles.

Brand claims vs. verified. Grove markets the product with sustainability and ingredient-transparency claims, which are brand-stated. Our grading reflects reviewed materials showing no evidence of PFAS-associated ingredients, an estimate based on public disclosure rather than independent lab testing.

Pros. Concentrate format, strong public ingredient disclosure, top model score matching the other three leaders.

Cons. Tied to a subscription-style retail platform, which may be a drawback for buyers who prefer one-off purchases.

The strong second tier, 75 to 85

Blueland Toilet Cleaner Tablets

Materials and format. A tablet-based cleaning system where concentrated tablets dissolve in refillable bottles, reducing plastic waste relative to pre-mixed liquid cleaners. Technically a toilet cleaner, it's graded within our all-purpose cleaning data set.

Brand claims vs. verified. Blueland emphasizes refillable packaging and discloses active ingredients on its site. These are brand claims. Our model's 85/100 score and Excellent grade reflect strong but slightly less exhaustive public disclosure compared to the 100-scoring concentrates above, based on available materials and data.

Pros. Minimal plastic waste via refill system, strong model score, clear ingredient disclosure for a tablet format.

Cons. Tablet dissolving system requires patience and precise water-fill lines. Scored slightly lower than the top four, reflecting our model's more conservative treatment of tablet-format disclosures.

Biokleen Spray and Wipe All Purpose Cleaner

Materials and format. The ready-to-use spray sibling of Biokleen's top-scoring concentrate, formulated for direct spray-and-wipe use without dilution.

Brand claims vs. verified. Shares the same brand-level claims as the Concentrate regarding avoidance of flagged chemical classes. These remain brand statements. Our model's 75/100 score reflects that the ready-to-use format and its specific disclosed ingredient set scored lower than the concentrate version, based on reviewed materials rather than a lab comparison between the two formats.

Pros. No dilution needed, same brand transparency commitment as Biokleen's higher-scoring concentrate, solid Excellent grade.

Cons. Scores 25 points below its own concentrate sibling in our model, illustrating that format and packaging specifics affect the score even within one brand's lineup.

Truly Free Everyday Cleaner

Materials and format. A general-purpose household cleaner marketed by Truly Free as part of a broader "clean label" product line aimed at reducing synthetic additives.

Brand claims vs. verified. Truly Free states its formulas are built around plant-derived ingredients and avoid several additive classes. This is a brand claim. Our model's Excellent grade at 75/100 reflects that reviewed materials showed no evidence of PFAS-associated ingredients, an estimate from public disclosure, not an independently verified lab result.

Pros. Solid Excellent grade, positioned as a general-purpose everyday cleaner, reasonably transparent public ingredient information.

Cons. Scored lower than the top four concentrates in our model, which may reflect either formulation differences or less granular public disclosure depth.

What to avoid

Our database does not currently list any all-purpose cleaner with a Poor or flagged PFAS grade, but based on general patterns we track across household cleaning products, there are categories of risk worth watching for when you shop outside this list.

• Vague "proprietary formula" labeling. Cleaners that disclose only partial ingredient lists make it impossible for any model, ours included, to rule out fluorinated surfactants or stain-repellent additives.
• Anti-fog, anti-streak, or "long-lasting shine" claims on glass and multi-surface sprays. These functional claims sometimes correlate with fluorosurfactant use in other product categories, and the same caution applies to multi-purpose cleaners making similar durability promises.
• Heavily scented, foam-boosted formulas with no public SDS. Without a safety data sheet or ingredient disclosure available for review, our model cannot assign anything better than a conservative or unrated grade.
• Bundled "PFAS-free" marketing claims with no named testing body. A brand stating it is PFAS-free is a brand claim, not a verified one, unless it cites a specific named independent lab and test method. Treat unverified claims as a starting point for research, not a guarantee.

If you're assessing a specific product not listed here, you can run it through our product finder to see how it compares against the graded items in this guide.

Our pick

Based on available materials and data, the four products tied at 100/100 Biokleen All Purpose Cleaner Concentrate Branch Basics The Concentrate Branch Basics All-Purpose Spray, and Grove Collaborative Multi-Purpose Cleaner Concentrate, represent the lowest-concern options our model has identified in this category to date. Among these, concentrate formats generally edge out ready-to-use sprays on packaging footprint, so if dilution doesn't bother you, Biokleen's Concentrate, Branch Basics' Concentrate, or Grove's Concentrate are reasonable starting points. If you prefer a spray you can use immediately, Branch Basics' All-Purpose Spray carries the same disclosed formulation and score as its concentrate sibling.

For buyers who want a solid, still-Excellent option at a potentially lower price point Biokleen Spray and Wipe All Purpose Cleaner and Truly Free Everyday Cleaner both scored 75/100, a grade that still clears our Excellent threshold even if it sits below the category's top tier. Blueland Toilet Cleaner Tablets, at 85/100, is worth a look if a refillable tablet system appeals to you specifically for bathroom cleaning tasks.

None of these grades should be read as a declaration that any product is "PFAS-free" or "safe" in an absolute sense. They reflect our model's reading of publicly available materials and brand disclosures at the time of grading. If PFAS exposure is a health concern for you or your household, remember that association between PFAS exposure and health outcomes documented in research is not the same as causation for any individual product or person, and you should weigh cleaning product choices alongside other exposure sources covered in our guides to whole-house filters and carpets and rugs.

Frequently asked questions

Is a 75/100 Excellent grade worse than a 100/100 grade in a way that matters for health?

Both scores fall within our model's Excellent tier, meaning reviewed materials showed no evidence of PFAS-associated ingredients for either product. The numeric gap generally reflects differences in disclosure depth, packaging format, or how conservatively our model treats a given product category, not a confirmed difference in actual PFAS content. Treat every score here as a model-based estimate from available data, not a lab-certified ranking.

Do any of these brands have third-party lab verification for their PFAS-free claims?

Based on the materials we reviewed, the claims described above are brand-stated rather than independently lab-verified unless a specific named testing body and method is cited directly by the manufacturer. We distinguish brand marketing language from verified third-party results throughout this guide, and you should look for named lab reports if independent verification matters to your decision.

How does PFAS risk in cleaners compare to other household categories?

PFAS and PFAS-adjacent concerns show up differently across product types. Categories like waterproof boots carpets and rugs, and fast food wrappers often involve intentional fluorochemical treatments for water or grease resistance, while all-purpose cleaners in our database currently show no flagged or poor grades. That said, associations between PFAS exposure and health outcomes reported in research do not establish causation for any single product, and category-wide patterns can shift as more products are tested and disclosed.