By PFAS Authority · Updated September 23, 2026
Top grades to buy
Aisle
Super Hipster
APEC Water Systems
APEC 2-in-1 Pull-Down Kitchen Faucet
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
Model-based grades, not lab tests. We flunk more than we pass. How grading works
PFAS in Waffle Makers, Which Brands Grade Best and Worst
Every waffle maker we reviewed in our database carries some level of PFAS-related concern, and none earned a rating better than "Poor." Based on available materials and data, the Nordic Ware Nordic Ware Original Stovetop Belgian Waffle Maker comes out ahead of the field with a model-based estimate of 40 out of 100, graded Poor. That is not a passing grade, and it is not evidence the product is free of PFAS. It simply means Nordic Ware's stovetop design and disclosed materials scored meaningfully better than every electric waffle maker we assessed, all of which landed at 15 out of 100 with a Bad rating.
If you are shopping for a waffle maker today and want the option with the fewest known PFAS-related red flags in our dataset, the Nordic Ware stovetop model is the one to start with, understanding it is a relative improvement rather than a clean bill of health. Everything else on this list, from Cuisinart to Breville to All-Clad, ties at the bottom tier. Below we break down how each product scored, what the brands claim, and what to avoid if PFAS exposure from nonstick cookware is a priority for your kitchen.
Summary comparison
| Product | PFAS Grade | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Nordic Ware Original Stovetop Belgian Waffle Maker | Poor (40/100) | Best of a weak field, still a concern |
| Kitchen Collection Flip Waffle Maker 26103KC | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Waffelo Belgian Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Hamilton Beach Belgian Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Cuisinart Double Flip Belgian Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Cuisinart Belgian Round Flip Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Cuisinart Classic Round Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Breville Smart Waffle Maker BWM640XL | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Breville No-Mess Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| Breville 4-Slice Smart Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| All-Clad Gourmet Digital Belgian Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| All-Clad Gourmet Belgian Waffle Maker | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
| All-Clad 4-Square Digital Gourmet Waffle Maker with Removable Plates | Bad (15/100) | High concern, avoid if possible |
Every score above is our model-based estimate built from disclosed materials, brand documentation, and public reporting. None of these figures come from a lab test we ran ourselves, and a higher number should be read as "lower concern," never as a guarantee of being PFAS-free.
Nordic Ware Original Stovetop Belgian Waffle Maker, the relative front runner
The Nordic Ware Original Stovetop Belgian Waffle Maker is a cast aluminum, stovetop-operated waffle iron with no digital controls, no nonstick electric plates, and no proprietary coating system to evaluate the way electric models require. Nordic Ware has long marketed its cast aluminum cookware around durability rather than nonstick chemistry, and the brand does not make an explicit PFAS-free claim for this product in materials we reviewed. That absence of a coated nonstick surface appears to be the main driver behind its comparatively better score.
Materials, Cast aluminum body, stovetop heat source, no listed nonstick coating layer in the same category as the electric competitors.
Brand claims, Nordic Ware promotes long-term durability and classic construction. We did not find a third-party verified PFAS-free certification tied to this specific product.
Pros, No electric nonstick coating to degrade over time, simple mechanical design, widely available replacement parts and long product lifespan reduce how often the item needs replacing.
Cons, Still scores Poor rather than a genuinely low-concern rating, requires more manual buttering or oiling since it lacks a dedicated nonstick layer, and a Poor grade means real caveats remain based on available materials and data.
The Bad-graded electric waffle makers, Cuisinart, Breville, and All-Clad
Every electric waffle maker in our database, regardless of price point or brand prestige, scored 15 out of 100 and earned a Bad rating. This includes budget models and premium models alike, which suggests the nonstick plate technology common across this product category, rather than brand tier, is driving the shared low score.
Cuisinart lineup
The Cuisinart Double Flip Belgian Waffle Maker Cuisinart Belgian Round Flip Waffle Maker, and Cuisinart Classic Round Waffle Maker all use nonstick-coated plates as the core cooking surface. Cuisinart markets these coatings around easy release and easy cleanup rather than making explicit PFAS-free claims across this range, and we did not find independent lab verification confirming a PFAS-free formulation for these specific models.
Pros, Consistent browning, easy food release, familiar flip mechanisms that many home cooks already know how to use.
Cons, Nonstick coating is the central concern driving the Bad rating, coating wear over time can be a factor in ongoing exposure risk, and no product in this sub-line separated itself from the others on score.
Breville lineup
The Breville Smart Waffle Maker BWM640XL Breville No-Mess Waffle Maker, and Breville 4-Slice Smart Waffle Maker are positioned as premium, feature-rich appliances with digital doneness controls and, in the No-Mess model, a moat design meant to contain batter overflow. Breville's marketing leans heavily on convenience and consistent results rather than PFAS-free assurances, and none of the three carried a verified third-party PFAS-free claim in the materials we reviewed.
Pros, Precise temperature and doneness controls, thoughtful design touches like overflow management, generally higher build quality than budget alternatives.
Cons, Higher price point does not translate into a better PFAS score, nonstick plate composition is again the likely driver of the Bad rating, and buyers paying a premium may reasonably expect more disclosure than what is currently available.
All-Clad lineup
The All-Clad Gourmet Digital Belgian Waffle Maker All-Clad Gourmet Belgian Waffle Maker, and All-Clad 4-Square Digital Gourmet Waffle Maker with Removable Plates round out the premium tier. All-Clad built its reputation on stainless steel cookware, but its waffle makers rely on coated nonstick plates just like the rest of the category, including the version with removable plates. Removable plates may help with cleaning convenience, but based on available materials and data we did not find that this design change improved the PFAS score relative to fixed-plate competitors.
Pros, Strong brand reputation for build quality, removable plates on one model simplify cleanup, digital models offer more cooking control than basic units.
Cons, Same 15/100 Bad rating as budget brands, premium pricing does not correspond to lower PFAS-related concern, and no verified PFAS-free certification was found for these models.
Other Bad-graded models
The Kitchen Collection Flip Waffle Maker 26103KC, the unbranded Belgian Waffle Maker, and the Hamilton Beach Belgian Waffle Maker also scored 15 out of 100. These budget-oriented models offer fewer features and lower price points than the Breville and All-Clad options, but they share the same nonstick plate approach and the same Bad rating, reinforcing that price tier is not a reliable predictor of PFAS-related concern in this category.
Pros, Lower upfront cost, simple operation, widely available at mainstream retailers.
Cons, Same coating-related concerns as premium brands, generally less documentation available from these manufacturers about plate composition, and no meaningful advantage over pricier competitors on this metric.
What to avoid
- Any electric waffle maker with fixed, non-removable nonstick plates and no disclosed coating chemistry, since this describes most of the Bad-graded products above.
- Marketing language like "easy release" or "effortless cleanup" used as a substitute for actual material disclosure. These are convenience claims, not PFAS-free claims, and should not be read as one.
- Assuming a higher price tag or premium brand name correlates with a better PFAS score. Our data shows Breville and All-Clad scoring identically to budget brands like Hamilton Beach.
- Scratched or heavily worn nonstick plates on any electric model, since coating degradation is generally considered a factor that can increase particle shedding during cooking, though the health implications of any single exposure remain an area of ongoing research and association rather than confirmed causation.
- Assuming "flip" or "digital" features change the underlying plate chemistry. In this dataset they did not move the score.
Our pick
Based strictly on the model-based scores in our database, the Nordic Ware Original Stovetop Belgian Waffle Maker is the pick if minimizing PFAS-related concern is your top priority, since it is the only product here rated Poor rather than Bad. That said, a Poor rating still reflects real concerns based on available materials and data, not a clean bill of health, and Nordic Ware has not published a verified, third-party-confirmed PFAS-free claim for this product. If you are also weighing other kitchen tools for PFAS exposure, our cast iron skillets guide and non-stick knife sets guide cover adjacent categories where uncoated or alternative-material options tend to score better than coated equivalents. For a broader search across appliances and categories, try our product finder to compare items against the same scoring model used here.
FAQ
Is any waffle maker in this dataset actually PFAS-free?
No product reviewed here has a verified, third-party-confirmed PFAS-free status in the materials we examined. The Nordic Ware stovetop model scores better because it lacks a conventional nonstick electric plate, but "Poor" is still a caution grade, not a clearance, and no manufacturer here has published lab-confirmed PFAS-free documentation.
Does a higher price mean a better PFAS grade for waffle makers?
Not in this dataset. Premium brands like Breville and All-Clad scored the same 15/100 Bad rating as budget brands like Hamilton Beach and Kitchen Collection. Price and feature set did not correlate with a better PFAS-related score among the electric models we reviewed.
Should I stop using my current waffle maker if it scores Bad?
That is a personal risk decision. Any association between PFAS exposure and health outcomes reflects ongoing research and does not establish direct causation for an individual product or user. If you want to reduce potential exposure, consider a stovetop, uncoated option like the Nordic Ware model, avoid cooking on scratched or degraded nonstick surfaces, and use our finder tool to compare alternatives across kitchen categories before deciding.
Now check your own stuff
See every product we’ve graded in this category, best-graded first.
Get the graded list, free.
The products we score each week, and the best-graded alternative in every category.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.