PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall26/ 100Poor
Berkley Trilene Big Game 1/4 lb. Fishing Line

Berkley · Fishing Tackle & Gear

Berkley Trilene Big Game 1/4 lb. Fishing Line

Poor

Skip. Fishing line coating composition undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipNylon monofilament with undisclosed water-resistant coating; PFAS concern unresolved, but fishing line poses minimal typical chemical exposure risk if used as directed.

Berkley doesn't disclose PFAS or coating chemistry for this nylon monofilament fishing line. Water-resistant fishing lines commonly use Teflon-family coating treatments, but Berkley provides no transparency.

The better-graded swap

Maxima Ultragreen Monofilament Fishing Line 35lb Green

Maxima

Maxima Ultragreen Monofilament Fishing Line 35lb Green

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon monofilament with undisclosed water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed water-resistant coating composition

Berkley does not publish the chemical identity of the coating used on Trilene Big Game. Water-resistant additives in fishing line historically include wax, silicone, or Teflon-family coating; without disclosure, the presence of PFAS or other persistent additives cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🫧

Nylon degradation and microparticle release

Nylon monofilament gradually breaks down under UV and mechanical stress, potentially shedding micro-fibers. While consumer exposure is minimal during normal handling and use, environmental persistence of these particles is documented and recognized as a microplastics concern.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis

No reported cases or recalls of allergic contact dermatitis specific to Berkley Trilene monofilament. Nylon is generally inert; risk would arise only if additives (dyes, lubricants, or biocides) trigger individual sensitivity, which is not a documented pattern for this product.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Berkley Trilene is available in multiple colors, but no public reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in the dyes used. Fishing line dyes are typically organic azo or synthetic dyes; no specific testing data is available for this product.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Off-gassing or odor from spool packaging

Nylon monofilament spools are not known to emit volatile organic compounds during storage or use. No consumer complaints or product testing has flagged VOC emissions from Berkley Trilene packaging or the line itself.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Berkley Trilene Big Game is nylon monofilament, a synthetic polymer extruded into a single strand. The "water-resistant coating" mentioned on packaging is not chemically detailed by the manufacturer, which is standard industry practice for competitive reasons. Nylon itself is chemically stable during normal fishing use and does not leach into water or fish under typical conditions. The undisclosed coating raises the primary concern about potential water-resistant additives, which in fishing line context often includes wax or silicone, but PFAS cannot be confirmed without testing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Berkley (owned by Pure Fishing, a Newell Brands subsidiary) does not publicly commit to PFAS-free formulations or provide detailed chemical disclosure for fishing line coatings. The company has not faced widely reported recalls or safety actions specific to monofilament composition. Standard industry opacity applies, fishing line manufacturers rarely disclose water-resistant additive chemistry due to proprietary formulations. No third-party certifications (such as eco-labels or hazard certifications) are associated with this product line.

How it compares in its category

Monofilament fishing line presents lower chemical risk than many consumer products because it has minimal skin or ingestion contact and is not heated or worn. Most major brands (Berkley, Spiderwire, Suffix) use similarly opaque disclosure practices for coatings. Braided lines and fluorocarbon alternatives exist but do not substantially reduce coating-composition uncertainty. The real differentiation in safety terms lies in end-of-life environmental persistence, where nylon monofilament is particularly problematic as wildlife hazard, not consumer chemical hazard.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight, as UV exposure degrades nylon and may accelerate any coating breakdown. Wash hands after handling if you have sensitive skin, though allergic reactions to nylon monofilament are rare. Replace the line annually or after visible fraying, discoloration, or loss of suppleness, as degraded line can shed particles. Dispose of spent line responsibly in trash, never in water, since monofilament entangles wildlife and persists for years.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Berkley has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fishing Tackle & Gear

Berkley X5 Braid Line

Berkley

X5 Braid Line

braided polyethylene fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fiber degradation

Limited concern

70

UV degradation and embrittlement

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Mold and bacterial colonization

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Surfactant or processing residues in braiding lubricants

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for typical braid but brand discloses nothing.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Rapala Ultra-Lite Fishing Lure Kit

Rapala

Ultra-Lite Fishing Lure Kit

plastic/resin lures, metal hooks

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🫧

Plastic resin degradation and microparticle shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Choking or aspiration hazard for children

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern; fishing lures unlikely to contain PFAS based on material type.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Rapala PXR Jowler 127

Rapala

PXR Jowler 127

Plastic/resin lure body with painted finish

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Paint coating degradation and particulate release

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70

Fishing lure with no disclosed PFAS risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fishing tackle & gear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.