PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall34/ 100Poor
All Season Wax

· Ski & Sports Wax

All Season Wax

Good

Skip; insufficient product transparency on formulation and PFAS status.

Verdict · SkipUnspecified wax formulation, silent brand stance on PFAS and additives, insufficient transparency to assess safety profile.

This wax has no public disclosure about PFAS content or formulation ingredients. Without transparency or third-party testing, PFAS risk cannot be assessed.

The better-graded swap

North Factory Team Wax Kit

North Factory Team Wax Kit

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Wax formulation, unspecified composition

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed additives (UV stabilizers, anti-caking agents, performance enhancers)

All-season wax formulations typically require additives to maintain consistency and performance across temperature ranges. Without a published ingredient list, the presence, type, and safety profile of these additives cannot be verified.

70/ 100
💨

Inhalation risk from dust or fumes

Wax dust inhalation can cause respiratory irritation in sensitive individuals. If this product contains undisclosed volatile components or contaminants, inhalation risk is elevated. No safety guidance is publicly available for this specific product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization from unknown fragrance or chemical additives

Some wax products include fragrance compounds, essential oils, or chemical biocides. Without disclosure, allergenic or irritant potential cannot be assessed for individual users.

70/ 100
🏷️

Thermal degradation of undisclosed components

If this wax is exposed to high temperatures during storage or use, unknown additives may break down into harmful byproducts. The lack of thermal stability data is a significant gap for a product marketed for all-season use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

If this wax is pigmented, lead or cadmium in synthetic dyes is theoretically possible but unconfirmed for this brand. Lack of testing transparency means this hazard cannot be ruled out.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Databarrier All Season Wax's exact composition is not publicly disclosed, which is the core problem. Wax products can be formulated from paraffin, beeswax, synthetic polymers, or blends, each with different thermal stability and additive loads. Without knowing whether this contains mineral oils, synthetic hydrocarbons, or plant-based waxes, and what colorants, UV stabilizers, or anti-caking agents are included, baseline safety assessment is impossible. The "all season" claim suggests performance additives that are unidentified.

The brand's record and disclosure

Databarrier has not published ingredient lists, safety data sheets, or certifications for this product in accessible public sources. The brand has made no public statement on PFAS avoidance or the presence of other regulated additives. No recalls or safety incidents are established for this product in consumer safety databases. The silence on formulation and PFAS status is the decisive issue, a responsible wax manufacturer would disclose composition, especially given that some industrial wax additives have included fluorochemicals.

How it compares in its category

Wax products span from simple, unadorned natural waxes (beeswax, carnauba) to heavily formulated industrial blends. Transparent competitors typically list paraffin, polymers, silica, or clay as main ingredients and declare any PFAS-free status explicitly. Databarrier's refusal to disclose puts it at the transparency floor of the category. Without ingredient clarity, it cannot be favorably compared to brands offering open formulation or third-party certifications.

If you buy it

Do not use this product until ingredient and PFAS status are published by the manufacturer. If you choose to proceed despite the opacity, store in a cool, dry place away from heat and direct sunlight, as unknown additives may degrade unpredictably. Avoid skin contact and inhalation of dust or fumes. Keep away from children and pets. Replace immediately if discoloration, odor changes, or separation occur, which may indicate additive breakdown or contamination.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 25% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Sports Wax

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax

Swix

PS10 Yellow Wax

Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
⚠️

Combustion by-products during hot application

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Swix PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Swix

PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Hydrocarbon wax blend (paraffin/synthetic hydrocarbon base)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from heating

Limited concern

70
💨

Inhalation of wax dust during application

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Maplus Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

Maplus

Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

ski wax base, fluorine-free formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Hydrocarbon volatiles and inhalation risk

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

More ski & sports wax grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.