PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall77/ 100Excellent

DiCAPac · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

WP-C2 Floating Waterproof Smartphone Case

Excellent

Lower concern; typical smartphone case material. No PFAS claims needed.

Verdict · BuyTPE construction with lower PFAS concern; no reported hazards in established records. Suitable for casual waterproof smartphone protection.

DiCAPac WP-C2 uses TPE, a synthetic elastomer without inherent PFAS risk. No waterproof coating treatment disclosed, relying on seals and design for water resistance.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) housing and seals

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What WP-C2 Floating Waterproof Smartphone Case is made of, ingredients and materials

The WP-C2 uses thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) for its housing and seals, a synthetic rubber polymer that combines flexibility with water-resistance without requiring Teflon-type coating or other problematic coatings. TPE is inherently water-repellent due to its molecular structure, not surface treatment, making it a stable choice for float cases. No glazes, enamels, or ceramic liners are present, eliminating lead/cadmium leaching pathways common in cookware. The material does not off-gas formaldehyde or volatile organics at normal use temperatures (smartphone operation and ambient storage).

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

TPE can shed microparticles if abraded, crimped, or exposed to UV; this is primarily an environmental concern if case fragments enter waterways, not a direct consumer exposure risk during normal smartphone protection use.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth in sealed environment

Waterproof seals trap moisture; if the case is sealed for extended periods without drying the phone or interior, bacteria or mold may grow inside the case itself, not from material leachate. Regular ventilation between uses mitigates this.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

No records of phthalate migration or presence in DiCAPac WP-C2 or similar modern TPE cases. Older PVC-based waterproof cases posed this hazard; TPE has replaced PVC in current designs.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

TPE does not require cadmium, lead, or antimony colorants; black TPE cases typically use carbon black, which is not classified as a hazardous substance at normal use concentrations.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Contact dermatitis or skin irritation from material or residue

TPE is generally well-tolerated on skin; no established cases of allergic reaction or sensitization from DiCAPac cases. Irritation is far more likely from residual salt, chlorine, or soap trapped inside than from TPE itself.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

DiCAPac, a manufacturer of waterproof cases and dry bags, maintains minimal public disclosure on materials testing or third-party certifications specific to chemical hazards. No recalls or safety controversies are on record for this model. The brand's silence on PFAS stance is typical for casual smartphone accessories and does not indicate undisclosed use. No evidence of BPA, phthalates, or banned flame retardants in TPE-based phone cases from this category has emerged in regulatory or consumer databases.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof smartphone cases typically rely on TPE, silicone, or polyurethane seals. The WP-C2's TPE construction is a mid-range material choice that avoids the higher hazard profile of older PVC cases (which may leach phthalates) and offers similar performance to silicone at lower cost. Floating designs in this category are common and pose no inherent chemical risk; buoyancy is achieved through material density and air pockets, not additives. Hard plastic alternatives (polycarbonate, ABS) may use flame retardants in their formulation, whereas TPE does not typically require them.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or heat above 60°C (140°F), as TPE can soften or degrade over time. Rinse the seals with fresh water after saltwater or chlorinated pool use to prevent salt crystallization or degradation. Replace the case if seals crack, tear, or no longer form a watertight closure; degraded seals compromise waterproofing but do not release hazardous leachates in normal conditions. Store in a cool, dry place away from oils, greases, or strong solvents, which can degrade TPE elasticity.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
DiCAPac has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.