PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Garmont Men's Dragontail MNT GTX

Garmont · Hiking Shoes & Trail Runners

Garmont Men's Dragontail MNT GTX

Bad

Gore-Tex likely contains legacy PFAS, Garmont won't confirm.

Verdict · SkipGore-Tex mountaineering boot with likely legacy PFAS in membrane; non-PFAS hazards minimal if maintained. Purchase acceptable with awareness.

Gore-Tex membranes historically contained PFOA-based chemistry, though newer versions may use alternatives. Garmont says nothing about PFAS in this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex membrane with nylon upper

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Fluorocarbon surfactants in Gore-Tex membrane

Gore-Tex's waterproofing mechanism historically relied on legacy PFAS compounds. Current Gore products may contain reduced PFAS, but Garmont has not published which Gore-Tex variant is used in the Dragontail MNT GTX, making legacy PFAS presence likely. This is graded separately per your brief; noted here for completeness.

20/ 100
⚠️

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes on nylon upper

Outer nylon uppers in alpine boots are typically treated with water-repellent coatings to extend Gore-Tex durability. Many water-repellent coating treatments still use PFOA or PFOS analogs, though some brands have switched to non-fluorinated alternatives. Garmont does not disclose which water-repellent coating chemistry is applied, making this a latent exposure vector on the nylon surface.

70/ 100
💨

Off-gassing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from adhesives

Boot assembly involves multiple synthetic adhesives (midsole bonding, insole attachment, Gore-Tex lamination). Most modern boots meet EN 71-10 limits for volatile compounds, but Garmont does not disclose compliance or adhesive chemistry. Initial off-gassing in the first few weeks of use is typical and harmless; ensure good ventilation during break-in.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No specific testing or recalls for formaldehyde in Garmont boots are on record. Alpine boots use minimal synthetic dyes (mostly dark nylon and rubber) and low-temperature assembly, making formaldehyde release unlikely in finished product, though residual levels in adhesives cannot be ruled out without disclosure.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Garmont does not publish heavy metal testing data for footwear. The predominantly nylon and rubber construction of the Dragontail uses minimal pigments; any colorants are likely azo-free disperse dyes, which are standard in the industry. No recalls or reports of lead or cadmium in Garmont boots are documented.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Dragontail MNT GTX pairs a nylon upper with Gore-Tex waterproof-breathable membrane, a three-layer laminate that repels water while allowing vapor transmission. The Gore-Tex layer historically required fluorocarbon-based surfactants (legacy PFAS) to function; Gore has phased some PFAS but manufacturing timelines mean many current boots still contain them. Nylon itself is stable and not a direct health vector in footwear, but the membrane's water-resistance treatment and any water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes on the outer nylon are where chemical exposure risk concentrates.

The brand's record and disclosure

Garmont is an Italian mountaineering-focused bootmaker with no published PFAS phase-out statement or third-party chemical disclosure on record. The company does not advertise testing for heavy metals, formaldehyde, or azo dyes in product lines. Absence of disclosure does not confirm presence of hazards, but it reflects limited transparency compared to outdoor brands with active chemical management policies (e.g., Salewa, La Sportiva parent companies). No product recalls for chemical contamination are documented for Garmont footwear.

How it compares in its category

Mountaineering boots universally use Gore-Tex or equivalent PFAS-containing membranes to meet waterproofing standards at altitude. The Dragontail sits in the mid-premium segment; competitors (Scarpa, Dolomite, Salewa) have identical membrane chemistry and similar disclosure gaps. No commercially available alpine boot at this performance tier has demonstrated waterproofing without relying on materials linked to PFAS. Differentiation lies in durability and fit, not chemical hazard reduction.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or UV, as Gore-Tex membranes can degrade under extreme conditions, potentially compromising waterproofing and releasing particulate matter. Clean with lukewarm water and mild soap only; avoid strong solvents or heat-drying. Replace insoles and worn laces proactively; boots should last 3-5 seasons of heavy use if properly maintained. Inspect the ankle collar and toe cap annually for cracking, which indicates membrane fatigue and a signal to retire the boot.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Garmont has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More hiking shoes & trail runners grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.