Retinol + Ferulic Acid Body Cream
Lower concern cosmetic, no known PFAS use in formulation or packaging.
Retinol body creams typically use standard emulsion ingredients without intentional PFAS. No public PFAS disclosures or third-party verification found for this product. Standard skincare formulations present lower PFAS concern than water-resistant or grease-resistant products.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
emulsified cream base with retinol and ferulic acid actives
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Retinol + Ferulic Acid Body Cream is made of, ingredients and materials
This is a water-in-oil or oil-in-water emulsion containing retinol (a vitamin A derivative) and ferulic acid (a plant-derived antioxidant). Both are well-established cosmetic actives with long histories of use; retinol in particular has decades of safety data in topical formulations at typical body cream concentrations (usually 0.25-1%). The emulsified base allows these lipophilic and hydrophilic ingredients to blend; standard emulsifiers used in this type of product (such as glyceryl stearate or cetyl alcohol) are not flagged as systemic concerns in cosmetic concentrations.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
If this product contains fragrance, individual sensitivity depends on fragrance type and concentration; the product label does not typically disclose fragrance component breakdowns (as permitted under 'fragrance' or 'parfum' nomenclature in most jurisdictions). Common fragrance allergens (limonene, linalool, eugenol) may be present but are not flagged as a specific concern for this brand or formul
1,4-dioxane contamination in emulsifiers or surfactants
1,4-dioxane can form as a byproduct during ethoxylation of emulsifiers and surfactants; its presence depends on manufacturing controls and purification, not formulation intent. No specific testing or disclosure of 1,4-dioxane levels in this product is available; typical cosmetic-grade emulsifiers are subject to FDA guidance limits (under 30 ppm) but are not routinely tested by independent labs for
Retinol photosensitivity and skin barrier disruption
Retinol is an established irritant at high concentrations and can increase photosensitivity and skin dryness with regular use. This is a known pharmacological effect, not a contamination hazard, and is manageable through application timing (night use) and sun protection. Users with compromised skin barrier, pregnancy, or photosensitive conditions should consult a healthcare provider before use.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No on-record use of formaldehyde donors (such as DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea) in Medix 5.5 formulations. Standard cosmetic preservatives in emulsified creams are more commonly phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone, or parabens; none of these are formaldehyde sources at typical use levels.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
This product is an uncolored or lightly tinted emulsion; no pigment-based colorants are part of the standard formulation for retinol body creams in this category. Iron oxides or titanium dioxide may be used in minimal amounts for tint, both of which have low systemic absorption in topical use.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Medix 5.5 is a mass-market skincare brand under Genomma Lab Internacional. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party safety testing summaries publicly. No product recalls, contamination findings, or formulation controversies involving this specific cream are on record. The company's PFAS stance is silent; however, the product itself shows lower concern for PFAS use based on formulation type and packaging context.
How it compares in its category
Retinol body creams are a competitive segment; this product sits in the mass-market tier alongside brands like Olay and CeraVe rather than luxury or clinical-grade lines. Formulations at this price point typically rely on standard, widely-available emulsifiers and preservatives rather than novel or experimental additives. Retinol potency and stabilization vary; this product does not disclose concentration or stabilization method, which is common for non-premium brands but limits transparency versus premium competitors.
If you buy it
Retinol can cause photosensitivity and skin irritation, especially in new users or on sensitive skin; apply a sunscreen (SPF 30+) during daytime use, or use only at night. Store in a cool, dark place to prevent retinol degradation; direct heat, light, or high humidity may reduce potency. Discontinue if burning, severe redness, or rash develops; patch test on a small area first. Typical shelf life after opening is 6-12 months depending on storage conditions.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Medix 5.5 has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Retinol + Ferulic Acid Body Cream?
- Plant oils, butters, waxes
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance allergens
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Water, oils, glycerin, botanical extracts
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Fragrance allergens (botanical extracts)
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More moisturizer grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.