PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall73/ 100Good

Medix 5.5 · Moisturizer

Vitamin C + Turmeric Body Cream

Excellent

Low PFAS concern for typical cosmetic formulation, but verify full ingredient list.

Verdict · BuyLow concern, emollient cream with no established heavy metal or formaldehyde hazards; PFAS low; limited brand disclosure but no safety record issues.

Vitamin C and turmeric body creams are cosmetics without typical PFAS use cases. No brand disclosure on PFAS, but the product category presents lower concern than treated textiles or coated cookware.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

emollient cream base with vitamin C and turmeric extract

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Vitamin C + Turmeric Body Cream is made of, ingredients and materials

This is an emollient cream base (typically water, oils, and thickeners) with added vitamin C and turmeric extract. Vitamin C is a cosmetic antioxidant; turmeric is a botanical extract with anti-inflammatory properties. The base itself, emollients and humectants, carries no inherent heavy metal or formaldehyde-release risk if formulated without those additives. The concern is whether stabilizers, preservatives, or pigmentation in the turmeric introduce trace contaminants.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Turmeric root can bioaccumulate heavy metals depending on soil source. No recall or testing result is on record for this specific Medix product; risk is material-class and supplier-dependent, not brand-specific.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and unlabeled components

If the product contains fragrance (natural or synthetic), individual sensitizing components need not be disclosed on the label under US and EU law. Turmeric and vitamin C stabilizers may also contain minor allergens not itemized.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane in emulsifiers or preservatives

Some ethoxylated emulsifiers and non-ionic surfactants used in cream bases can contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. No specific testing result is public for this product; the hazard is formulation-dependent, not brand-specific.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence of formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in this product's known formulation. Standard cosmetic preservatives (parabens, phenoxyethanol) do not release formaldehyde at cosmetic pH and use rates.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc contamination

Talc is not a typical emollient cream ingredient and is not mentioned in available product information for Medix 5.5. Risk is low unless the brand substitutes talc as a thickener, which would be unusual and unlabeled.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Medix 5.5 has no widely documented safety recalls or controversies on record for this product line. The brand does not publicly disclose full ingredient lists or third-party testing results in accessible formats, which limits transparency verification. No certifications (organic, hypoallergenic, dermatologist-tested) are prominently claimed. This is typical for mid-market personal care; absence of disclosure is not the same as absence of safety, but it does mean you cannot independently verify specific ingredients beyond the label.

How it compares in its category

Body creams in this price and formulation tier are standard consumer products with low inherent hazard profiles when free of known problematic preservatives or colorants. Medix 5.5 sits in the conventional cosmetic range; it is not marketed as natural, organic, or clinical-grade, so expectations for purity are aligned with commercial standards. Compared to unpreserved or heavily botanical formulations, a standardly preserved emollient cream typically has a clearer toxicological profile.

If you buy it

Use as directed on unbroken skin. If you have fragrance sensitivity or known azo dye or preservative allergies (e.g., parabens, phenoxyethanol), request the full ingredient list from the brand before purchase. Store at room temperature away from direct heat; do not heat or microwave the product. Discontinue if rash, burning, or itching occurs. A standard jar of body cream typically lasts 2, 3 months with daily use; replace if separation, odor change, or mold appears.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Medix 5.5 has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Vitamin C + Turmeric Body Cream?

Weleda

Skin Food Body Butter

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ NATRUE certified natural cosmetic
  • Plant oils, butters, waxes
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Earth Mama

Simply Non-Scents Baby Lotion

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, oils, glycerin, botanical extracts
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Fragrance allergens (botanical extracts)

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More moisturizer grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.