PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Nike Men's Dri-FIT Pro Tight Sleeveless Fitness Top

Nike · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Nike Men's Dri-FIT Pro Tight Sleeveless Fitness Top

Bad

Lower concern, but Nike doesn't disclose water-repellent coating chemistry.

Verdict · SkipPolyester blend with standard Dri-FIT treatment; no established recalls or documented hazards; Nike has fair labor certifications but lacks transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry.

Dri-FIT apparel typically uses water-repellent coating finishes that may contain PFAS. Nike rarely confirms specific treatment details in its products.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with Dri-FIT moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Wrinkle resistance and shape-retention finishes sometimes contain formaldehyde-releasing compounds. Nike does not disclose finish chemistry for this product; formaldehyde presence is plausible but has not been reported as a safety issue in Dri-FIT apparel at consumer exposure levels.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Dri-FIT moisture-wicking treatments can degrade with heat, detergent, and friction over years, potentially shedding microscopic particles. This is not unique to Nike and is inherent to treated synthetic apparel; washing in cool water and avoiding heat extends coating life.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes and synthetic dye allergens

No azo dye restrictions or documented allergic reactions linked to Nike Dri-FIT apparel are on record. Standard polyester athletic wear typically uses compliant disperse dyes; this product has not triggered known sensitization complaints.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis. No studies or recalls document unsafe antimony migration from Nike Dri-FIT garments at typical wear concentrations, and polyester fiber itself resists leaching under normal conditions.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Modern polyester dyes rarely contain cadmium or lead in compliant supply chains. No recalls or independent testing document toxic heavy metal content in Nike Dri-FIT colorways.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This top is polyester (synthetic fiber) blended with elastane, treated with Nike's proprietary Dri-FIT moisture-wicking system. Polyester itself is chemically stable when worn; the risk centers on the finish applied to achieve moisture management. Dri-FIT typically involves fluorocarbon or silicone-based water-repellent treatments, though Nike does not publicly detail which chemistry they use for this specific product, leaving water-repellent coating composition opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has faced criticism for limited transparency on chemical treatments in sportswear, though the company maintains several environmental and labor certifications (Nike Manufacturing Index, Better Cotton Initiative participation). No major health recalls exist for Dri-FIT apparel on record. Nike has not published ingredient-level disclosure for moisture-wicking treatments, making independent verification of water-repellent coating safety claims difficult for consumers.

How it compares in its category

Dri-FIT polyester blends are industry standard for athletic wear; competitors like Adidas and Under Armour use similar approaches with comparable opacity on finish chemistry. This product occupies the mainstream mid-tier of performance apparel, where chemical treatment details are rarely disclosed by any major brand. No category-wide safety advantage or disadvantage is evident from public records.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air dry to minimize degradation of the Dri-FIT coating and reduce any potential leaching during heat exposure. Avoid prolonged heat (high dryer temperatures, direct sunlight storage) which can degrade synthetic coatings over years of use. Replace when elasticity is visibly lost or coating becomes sticky/flaking. Normal wear and care present minimal risk; the product is designed for direct skin contact in athletic contexts.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Basic cotton tee, lower PFAS concern with no waterproofing.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton, no water-repellent finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, plain cotton tee with no water-repellent coating treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

100% cotton long-sleeve shirt

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and dye residuals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, bare cotton apparel with no added treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.