PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Osprey Sirrus 24 Backpack

Osprey · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Osprey Sirrus 24 Backpack

Bad

High risk. water-repellent coating-treated outdoor pack with undisclosed PFAS status.

Verdict · SkipDurable outdoor pack with undisclosed PFAS in water-repellent coating; no formaldehyde or azo-dye issues on record, but PFAS opacity and durability concerns warrant informed purchase.

Osprey's daypack does not publicly disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating chemistry. Typical outdoor backpacks use PFAS-based water repellency treatments without confirmed alternatives here.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication safety

Over 2-4 years of heavy use, water-repellent coating coatings wear and require reapplication. Consumer aftermarket water-repellent coating treatments vary in chemical composition and may contain undisclosed PFAS or other water-repellents; re-treating with unknown formulations introduces new chemical exposure not covered by original manufacturing.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from nylon/polyester

All synthetic fabric packs shed microplastics during washing and wear, particularly if the outer coating degrades. This is an environmental hazard rather than direct consumer toxicity, but relevant to lifecycle impact of the product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester/nylon

No evidence of restricted azo dyes in Osprey Sirrus 24 colorways on record. Osprey does not specify dye sourcing, but outdoor gear in this class rarely involves problematic azo chemistry.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is used as a flame retardant and catalyst in some polyester manufacturing. Osprey does not disclose antimony levels; standard outdoor backpack polyester typically contains trace amounts with lower concern for skin contact under normal use.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist or anti-microbial treatments are confirmed on this pack model. water-repellent coating finishes are the primary coating; fluorine-based water-repellent coating does not release formaldehyde.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Sirrus 24 uses nylon and polyester as base fabrics, both synthetic polymers that are inherently stable and do not leach chemicals under normal conditions. The critical component is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish, a chemical coating applied to the exterior to shed water without compromising breathability. water-repellent coating finishes are typically either fluorine-based (PFAS, which Osprey has not disclosed) or fluorine-free alternatives; Osprey's specific chemistry remains proprietary and unavailable to consumers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Osprey has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating formulations or provided transparency on their chemical suppliers, unlike some competitors (e.g., Patagonia's move toward fluorine-free finishes). The brand does not list environmental or chemical certifications on the Sirrus 24 product page. No recalls or chemical safety incidents involving this model are on record, but the lack of disclosure contrasts with industry leaders who now publish supply-chain commitments.

How it compares in its category

Most mid-range outdoor packs (REI Co-op, Deuter, some Patagonia models) either disclose water-repellent coating type or offer fluorine-free alternatives. Osprey's silence on this issue is increasingly uncommon in the outdoor gear market, where PFAS awareness has driven competitor differentiation since 2019-2020. For a pack in this price tier and reputation, transparency is a notable gap relative to newer entrants focused on sustainable outdoor goods.

If you buy it

Nylon and polyester are not materials linked to PFAS; the pack's durability and water resistance will persist through several years of outdoor use without known degradation into microplastics under typical conditions. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct high heat (e.g., leaving it in a hot car or near flames), which could theoretically accelerate coating breakdown. Wash occasionally with cool water and mild soap; do not dry-clean, which may degrade water-repellent coating. Replace the pack if the outer fabric shows persistent peeling or flaking of the finish, which may indicate degradation of the coating layer.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Osprey has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.