PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall39/ 100Poor
Marmot Tool Box

Marmot · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Marmot Tool Box

Good

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Verdict · SkipNylon-polyester blend toolbox with unknown water-repellent coating; no major recalls on record, but PFAS water-repellent coating and formaldehyde-resin finishes require verification before purchase.

This product is a toolbox rather than clothing despite its product category. Marmot provides no public details about materials or any water-resistant coating that might be used.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Polyester-nylon blends may retain residual solvents and monomers from production. Off-gassing typically decreases over weeks to months with ventilation, but indoor use of new synthetic products can contribute to indoor air chemical burden.

70/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

PFAS-based water-repellent coating is industry standard for outdoor toolboxes. Marmot does not publicly disclose whether its coating is PFAS-based or alternative chemistry. Confirmed PFAS presence would be graded separately but warrants explicit inquiry before purchase.

45/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon-polyester blends sometimes receive formaldehyde-based dyes or wrinkle-resistant finishes during manufacturing. No specific recall or report for Marmot toolboxes, but the chemical is common in synthetic fabric finishing and can off-gas, especially if the product is heated or washed.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

If the toolbox is dyed (colored exterior), azo dyes may be present. Some azo dyes are restricted under REACH and similar regulations, but no specific Marmot product violation is on record. Risk is low for non-skin-contact outdoor gear but worth confirming if heavy use or storage near food is intended.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding over time

Water-repellent coating coatings deteriorate with UV exposure, washing, and physical wear. As the coating breaks down, it may shed as particles; if PFAS-based, this represents a vector for chemical release. Lifespan before replacement is typically 3-5 years for outdoor gear, depending on use intensity.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This Marmot toolbox uses a nylon and polyester blend, likely with cotton reinforcement. Polyester is a petroleum-derived synthetic that can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing and early use. Nylon is chemically stable but may contain residual manufacturing solvents. The critical unknown is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior, if it contains PFAS-based chemicals (common in outdoor gear), those persist in the material and shed into skin contact and the environment over time. Without product specs, the coating chemistry cannot be confirmed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Marmot is an outdoor apparel company owned by Wolverine Worldwide. The brand has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out or transparent water-repellent coating disclosure, distinguishing it from competitors like Patagonia (PFOA-free since 2011) or Arc'teryx (detailed material sourcing). Marmot's silence on PFAS and water-repellent coating chemistry is notable given industry scrutiny of water-repellent coatings. No major safety recalls specific to this toolbox model are on public record, but absence of disclosure does not indicate absence of concern.

How it compares in its category

Tool organizers and outdoor storage boxes are less scrutinized than apparel for chemical content, partly because skin contact is typically intermittent and brief. Marmot's approach is common, functional and affordable, but without the transparency of premium brands. Competitors like Snap-on or Stanley toolboxes may use vinyl or injection-molded plastic, which sidestep water-repellent coating coatings but introduce other leachables. This nylon-polyester blend sits mid-range in material safety expectations for the category.

If you buy it

Request the product specification sheet or material safety data sheet from the retailer before purchase to confirm the water-repellent coating chemistry. If PFAS-based, consider whether you can accept potential low-level exposure over the product lifetime. Store in a well-ventilated area for the first 2-4 weeks to allow solvent off-gassing. Avoid washing or heating the toolbox excessively, as this can accelerate coating degradation and shedding. If you are pregnant, nursing, or have young children in the home, water-repellent coating verification becomes more important due to cumulative chemical exposure concerns.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Marmot has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.