PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
CamelBak Women's Fourteener 30

CamelBak · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

CamelBak Women's Fourteener 30

Bad

High risk. Likely contains PFAS-based water-repellent coating with no brand disclosure.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester pack with likely PFAS-based water-repellent coating; no major non-PFAS hazards established, but brand transparency absent and durability of coating unknown long-term.

CamelBak's hiking pack features water-repellent coating finishes standard in the category for weather protection. No public PFAS disclosure or testing is available from the brand.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester textile may contain antimony trioxide used as a catalyst in fiber production. Levels are typically low and not mobile in finished fabric, but long-term skin contact during heavy wear (shoulder straps) in warm conditions could theoretically increase dermal exposure; no incident data exists for this pack model.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and leaching

If PFAS-based water-repellent coating is present, washing, wear, and weathering will cause gradual degradation and shedding of microparticles and residual monomers into sweat and hand contact. Long-term exposure risk depends on frequency of use and whether reapplication occurs.

20/ 100
🫧

Polyester microfiber shedding with wear

Nylon and polyester packs shed microfibers during abrasion and laundering. This pack's durability is well-regarded, so shedding is likely minimal during normal use, but hand-washing and worn seams may release particles over years of heavy use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in nylon/polyester fabric

CamelBak does not publicly disclose dye chemistry or azo restrictions for this pack. No recalls or public health advisories specific to CamelBak packs for azo dye contamination have been documented.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

CamelBak does not disclose formaldehyde-free finishes. Modern nylon and polyester packs rarely require formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist treatments, but no independent testing or certification (such as OEKO-TEX) is publicly available for this model.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a nylon and polyester blend backpack with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer fabric. water-repellent coating coatings shed water without pooling inside the pack or wetting your gear. Most commercial water-repellent coating treatments on outdoor gear have historically used PFAS-based chemistries (perfluorocarbons), which are persistent and bioaccumulative; some brands have switched to fluorine-free alternatives, but CamelBak has not publicly disclosed which technology they use on this model.

The brand's record and disclosure

CamelBak does not publicly disclose the water-repellent coating chemistry used in their packs, nor do they appear to have published a chemical transparency statement or PFAS phase-out timeline. The brand has no documented history of proactive chemical disclosure comparable to peers like Patagonia or Arc'teryx. This silence is common among mainstream outdoor brands, but it means you cannot verify whether PFAS-free alternatives were considered for this model.

How it compares in its category

Most 30L nylon/polyester backpacks in the mid-market range use conventional PFAS-based water-repellent coating; some premium brands (especially European and sustainability-focused makers) now offer fluorine-free water-repellent coating or uncoated options. CamelBak sits in the mainstream segment with no stated commitment to PFAS-free alternatives, placing it below leaders in chemical transparency but not uniquely worse than comparable mass-market packs.

If you buy it

Avoid laundering the pack in a washing machine, as this can accelerate water-repellent coating degradation and potentially release coated particles. Air-dry only after light hand-cleaning with cool water and mild soap. Reapply commercial water-repellent coating treatments as water beading diminishes (typically after 12-24 months of use), but be aware that reapplication uses the same PFAS or alternative chemistry. Consider reselling or donating when the pack reaches end-of-life rather than disposing in general waste, to reduce landfill leaching risk if PFAS-based coating is present.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
CamelBak has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.