PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Patagonia Black Hole Duffel Bag

Patagonia · Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Patagonia Black Hole Duffel Bag

Good

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Verdict · SkipDurable nylon duffel with established brand transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry; no known toxicity issues in luggage category; practical durability outweighs unverified PFAS claim.

Patagonia says 100% of its new products from Spring 2025 are made without intentionally added PFAS. We record that as an unverified brand claim. Its record describes a water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, which is still counted.

Brand says: “Patagonia says 100% of its new products from Spring 2025 are made without intentionally added PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

Granite Gear

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication uncertainty

Water-repellent coating finishes on nylon degrade after repeated washing and wear (typically 2-5 years). Reapplication products sold for consumer use often contain unstated fluorine chemistry. If you choose to retreat the bag, verify the product's PFAS status before application.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from nylon fabric

Nylon fibers can shed microplastics when abraded, especially if the bag is heavily used or washed frequently. This is not a toxicity hazard per se, but an environmental one. Normal luggage use does not cause significant shedding; aggressive washing or tumble drying would accelerate it.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Brand-stated PFAS-free

The brand states this product is PFAS-free. We have not verified the claim.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Patagonia textiles are subject to bluesign and GOTS auditing protocols that screen for azo dyes and heavy metals in colorants. No recalls or test failures for the Black Hole line have been reported. Standard nylon in this brand category is not a known vector for lead or cadmium contamination.

Source, FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon water-repellent coating treatments do not typically involve formaldehyde-based resins (those are common in cotton wrinkle-resistance finishes). No evidence of formaldehyde exposure from Patagonia nylon products has been documented.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Phthalate plasticizers in hardware or straps

The Black Hole uses metal and reinforced nylon hardware, not PVC zippers or plastic buckles known to off-gas phthalates. Patagonia's material sourcing excludes PVC in favor of nylon and metal, reducing this risk significantly.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Black Hole Duffel is constructed from nylon fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the exterior. Nylon itself is a synthetic polymer with no known hazardous leaching under normal use conditions. The water-repellent coating treatment repels water and light oils without requiring a rigid coating, so degradation over time poses minimal risk of particle shedding into food or skin contact. This design avoids the peeling-coating hazards common in rigid cookware or poorly bonded ceramic items.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has published detailed supply-chain transparency reports and commits to phasing out PFOA-based treatments in favor of fluorine-free alternatives. However, the exact chemistry of the water-repellent coating on the Black Hole line has not been independently verified as PFAS-free by third-party testing data in public domain. Patagonia's public stance on PFAS reduction is credible based on corporate statements, but the specific formulation remains proprietary. No recalls or health complaints tied to this product have been recorded.

How it compares in its category

Most waterproof luggage and duffel bags in this price range use either PFAS-containing water-repellent coating finishes or polyurethane/PVC coatings that off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Nylon with water-repellent coating sits in the middle, lower VOC risk than laminated fabrics but potentially higher PFAS uncertainty than fully fluorine-free alternatives. Patagonia's explicit commitment to PFAS reduction differentiates it from mass-market equivalents that make no such claim. Cotton and untreated canvas duffels avoid both concerns but lack water repellency.

If you buy it

Wash the bag occasionally with mild soap and water to maintain the water-repellent coating finish; hot water or dry cleaning solvents may degrade it. Avoid prolonged heat exposure (direct sun for weeks or near radiators), though normal temperature fluctuations pose no risk. The nylon will not leach into food or skin under normal storage and carrying conditions. Replace the bag if seams split or the fabric tears; the water-repellent coating finish is not repairable by consumers and degradation is gradual, not sudden.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Patagonia has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Kelty Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Kelty

Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Polyester webbing and nylon

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade69Good
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester webbing

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and seam-tape volatiles (VOC)

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from webbing degradation

Limited concern

70

Standard duffel bag, low PFAS risk but no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

Granite Gear

ToughSack Assorted Colors

Cordura nylon fabric

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Durable nylon pack without water treatment applied.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Salomon Extended Totebag

Salomon

Extended Totebag

polyester/nylon tote fabric, standard construction

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony trioxide in polyester

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Moderate concern

45
💨

VOC off-gassing from dyes and finishes

Limited concern

70

Standard tote with lower PFAS risk but no brand confirmation.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof bags & luggage grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.