Ultimate Absorbency Incontinence Pads Long Length
Skip until Poise discloses coating composition and PFAS status.
Poise incontinence pads contain waterproof surface treatments typical of the category, but the brand does not disclose coating chemistry or PFAS content. No third-party testing or certification available.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
cellulose core with unspecified waterproof/absorbent surface coatings
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Ultimate Absorbency Pads Long Length is made of, ingredients and materials
Poise pads use a cellulose core (wood pulp-derived absorbent material) with proprietary waterproof and absorbent surface coatings that are not publicly detailed. Cellulose itself is considered a lower-concern absorbent base, but the unspecified coatings, which prevent leakage and enhance fluid distribution, are the composition gap that matters here. The brand has not disclosed whether these coatings contain PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals"), which are common in waterproofing treatments for absorbent hygiene products and persist in the body and environment.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Waterproof coatings on incontinence pads commonly rely on PFAS-based treatments; Poise has not disclosed its formulation. Direct prolonged contact with skin and potential for PFAS migration into body tissues make composition transparency critical for this product class.
Source, ATSDR ↗Unspecified polymer or adhesive coatings (degradation and leachates)
The absorbent and waterproof surface treatments are proprietary and unnamed, making it impossible to assess whether they include plasticizers, uncrosslinked oligomers, or other leachables that may transfer under moisture and body heat over hours of wear.
Skin sensitization or irritation from undisclosed additives
Incontinence pads may contain antimicrobial agents, fragrance, or plasticizers to manage odor and fluid handling; Poise's ingredient opacity makes it difficult for consumers to identify triggers if localized dermatitis occurs.
Microplastic fragmentation during disposal or degradation
If waterproof coatings include synthetic polymers (common in non-PFAS waterproofing), breakdown in landfills or wastewater systems may release microplastics; no established data for this specific product, but structural degradation of multi-layer disposable hygiene products is recognized as a potential source.
What’s reassuring
Cellulose core processing residues (bleach, chlorine)
Incontinence pad cellulose is typically wood pulp that has been bleached and processed; no specific recalls or widespread complaints of bleach residue contamination are on record for Poise, though complete chlorine/dioxin absence is not confirmed by public testing.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Poise (owned by Kimberly-Clark) has not publicly released ingredient lists or composition details for its incontinence pad coatings, nor has it made formal statements on PFAS avoidance or use. The brand's silence on this issue is notable because competitors in the menstrual and incontinence space have begun disclosing PFAS status or pursuing PFAS-free formulations in response to consumer and regulatory pressure. Kimberly-Clark has faced past scrutiny over water use and chemical disclosures but has not positioned Poise as a leader in chemical transparency for incontinence products.
How it compares in its category
Incontinence pads vary widely in coating transparency; some brands (e.g., Depend, Always Discreet) also do not routinely disclose PFAS status, while a small subset of eco-focused or medical-grade alternatives have begun testing for or certifying PFAS absence. Poise is a mainstream, high-volume product with no known third-party testing results or certifications (organic, OEKO-TEX, GOTS) that would reduce composition uncertainty. Generic absorbent products with similar cellulose cores but no specialized waterproof coating would pose different, and in some respects lower, chemical concerns, though they would sacrifice absorbency.
If you buy it
Store pads in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, as moisture and warmth can degrade the cellulose and coatings over time. Change pads regularly (at least every 4-6 hours) to minimize skin contact duration and reduce any risk from degraded or saturated coating material. Do not wash or rinse pads for reuse; they are single-use and designed for disposal. If skin irritation, rash, or odor develops during use, discontinue and switch to an alternative brand; this may signal a sensitivity to an undisclosed coating component.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Poise has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.