PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall53/ 100Good
Puma Men's Power Mode Training Crewneck Tank Top

Puma · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Puma Men's Power Mode Training Crewneck Tank Top

Good

Lower concern, standard athletic tank with no water or stain treatment indicated.

Verdict · SkipStandard polyester/nylon athletic tank with no established hazard reports; typical brand disclosure; wear normally with standard laundry care.

This is a basic polyester and nylon athletic blend crewneck tank with no waterproofing or stain-resistance treatment mentioned. Puma makes no PFAS claims, and standard athletic wear carries lower risk than treated performance fabrics.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon athletic blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Polyester tanks typically use azo or reactive dyes. Puma discloses no testing for restricted azo compounds (those that break down into carcinogenic amines). Standard industry practice suggests compliance with EU/ZDHC restrictions, but without third-party certification this cannot be confirmed for this specific product.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Wrinkle-resistant or durable-press finishes on athletic blends can contain formaldehyde releasers used as cross-linkers. No public information indicates Puma uses or avoids these on basic tanks. Pre-wash reduces residual formaldehyde, though levels in untreated athletic wear are typically low.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and finish volatiles

If the tank is treated with scent or soft-hand finishes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and fragrance allergens may off-gas during initial wear. No specific information on Puma's finish chemistry for this model. Symptoms (irritation, headache) typically resolve after one wash and airing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis and can persist in fiber at trace levels. No recalls or public concern specific to Puma polyester apparel exist. Standard polyester does not leach antimony under normal wearing or laundering.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Dark or bright solid-color dyes may contain trace heavy metals (lead, cadmium) in pigments, particularly in red and yellow shades. Puma has no reported violations. Heavy metals in dyes do not migrate to skin under normal use; risk is primarily occupational during manufacturing.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This tank is a polyester/nylon blend, common in moisture-wicking athletic wear. Polyester is a synthetic polymer that does not leach chemicals under normal wearing conditions, though the dyes and finishing treatments applied during manufacturing are the primary chemical exposure concern. Nylon has similar safety profile under normal use. Athletic blends of this type are designed to dry quickly and resist wrinkles, which typically means minimal chemical loading compared to heavy performance coatings.

The brand's record and disclosure

Puma does not publicly disclose detailed chemical or PFAS use in individual product lines, which is typical of most athletic brands but below transparency leaders like Patagonia or The North Face. The company has faced no major recalls or public safety controversies specific to basic knit apparel. Puma is a mainstream manufacturer without known restrictions on hazardous dyes or formaldehyde use in their basic tank lines.

How it compares in its category

A polyester/nylon athletic tank sits in the middle of the market for chemical hazard risk. Fully synthetic blends avoid natural fiber contaminants (pesticide residues in cotton) but depend entirely on dye and finish chemistry. Most competitors (Nike, Adidas, Under Armour basic tanks) use nearly identical material formulations with comparable disclosure gaps. Premium brands offer third-party certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS) that reduce uncertainty; budget and mid-tier brands typically do not.

If you buy it

Wash before first wear to reduce loose dyes and residual finishes. Use cool water and standard detergent; polyester/nylon blends tolerate standard laundry without degradation. Avoid high heat (dryers over 130F or direct heat) to prevent fiber damage and potential fume release, though normal machine drying presents lower concern for these issues. Replace when elastic degrades or fiber pilling becomes visible, typically after 1-2 years of regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.