PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall77/ 100Excellent
Rollme R11 ECG Smart Health Ring

· Water-Resistant Smart Rings & Bands

Rollme R11 ECG Smart Health Ring

Excellent

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Verdict · BuyStainless steel ring with no identified coatings or chemical hazards; water resistance from design, not treatments. Low contamination risk.

The product information we reviewed describes stainless steel ring, with no water-repellent coating named. Water resistance on products like this usually comes from the material and its seals rather than a surface treatment. The brand has published no PFAS statement for it.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Stainless steel ring

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Rollme R11 ECG Smart Health Ring is made of, ingredients and materials

The Rollme R11 is constructed from stainless steel, an inert alloy resistant to corrosion and leaching under normal skin-contact conditions. Stainless steel contains iron, chromium, and nickel; while nickel can trigger allergic contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals, the alloy's passive oxide layer minimizes release. No enamel, ceramic coating, or polymer topcoat is described, eliminating typical cookware hazards like lead in glazes or Teflon-type coating fume risk.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Nickel from stainless steel alloy

Stainless steel typically contains 8-12% nickel. For most users, the passive oxide layer prevents release, but individuals with nickel contact sensitivity may experience localized dermatitis after prolonged wear.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal growth under band

Constant skin contact, moisture, and closed seals create an environment for microbial colonization if the ring is not cleaned regularly. This is a hygiene risk, not a material toxicity risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Leachables from internal adhesives or gaskets

No adhesives, gaskets, or sealant compositions have been disclosed by the brand. Standard biocompatible elastomers used in wearables pose minimal risk, but full material transparency is absent.

95/ 100
✅

Chromium (hexavalent) from stainless steel corrosion

Hexavalent chromium is a carcinogen and rare in properly formed stainless steel. No reports of abnormal corrosion or leaching exist for this model; risk is theoretical only under extreme neglect or mechanical damage.

95/ 100
✅

Allergens in textile or silicone sensor contact surfaces

The ring body is stainless steel, but internal sensor contacts or any silicone backing are not detailed. No allergen warnings or material specifications have been published for these sub-components.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The brand has not published specific material safety statements or chemical disclosures for the R11 ring. The brand has not faced documented safety recalls or contamination controversies tied to wearable rings or bands. Absence of a PFAS statement reflects industry-wide silence on fluorinated coatings in smart rings; no third-party testing of this model is on record.

How it compares in its category

Smart rings typically use stainless steel, titanium, or ceramic bodies. Stainless steel is common and reliable; it avoids the manufacturing opacity of titanium alloys and does not chip like ceramic. This product sits in the mainstream safety tier for the category, with no unusual material choices that elevate or reduce risk relative to competitors like Oura or Samsung Galaxy Ring.

If you buy it

Clean the ring regularly with mild soap and water to prevent skin irritation from sweat and bacteria buildup under the band. If you have a known nickel allergy, patch-test by wearing it for a few hours before extended use. The stainless steel body is durable and does not require special storage; water resistance is engineered into seals, not a coating, so it will not degrade over time if the seals remain intact. Replace the ring if seals visibly crack or if moisture enters the sensor chamber.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More water-resistant smart rings & bands grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.