PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall39/ 100Poor
Reebok Men's Speedwick Textured Active Tee

Reebok · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Reebok Men's Speedwick Textured Active Tee

Good

Lower concern, standard active tee without water-resistant finish.

Verdict · SkipPolyester/nylon blend active tee with no disclosed water treatment; standard textile hazards manageable with care; lower PFAS risk without water-repellent coating finish.

Speedwick uses polyester and synthetic blends for moisture-wicking, with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant treatment. Most active tees at this level lack PFAS-based water-repellent coating, though Reebok doesn't explicitly confirm absence.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon blend, no water-repellent coating treatment disclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester and nylon textiles are often finished with formaldehyde-releasing resins for wrinkle resistance and shape retention. Reebok does not disclose finish chemistry; new garments may off-gas formaldehydes at low levels, especially before first wash. This hazard diminishes sharply after laundering.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

All synthetic textile blends shed microplastics during wear and washing; polyester/nylon are no exception. The extent depends on fabric weave tightness, washing frequency, and mechanical stress. This tee offers no specialized microfiber-capture technology, so shedding is typical for the category.

20/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Although no water-repellent coating finish is disclosed, some dyes and wet-processing auxiliaries in textile manufacturing can contain PFAS as residual impurities. Risk is lower than with treated fabrics but not zero; no supply-chain transparency available to rule this out completely.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100

Azo dyes and color fastness

No specific reports of azo-dye issues with Reebok Speedwick textiles. However, mass-market synthetic apparel sometimes uses azo dyes that can break down into aromatic amines under skin contact, sweat, or heat. Dark colors carry slightly higher theoretical risk; no testing data available for this product line.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Polyester is occasionally produced using antimony trioxide as a catalyst; trace amounts may remain in the fiber. Health risk from wearing antimony-containing polyester is considered minimal under normal conditions, but no independent testing confirms whether Reebok's suppliers exclude or limit antimony residues.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This tee is a polyester/nylon blend, typical for moisture-wicking athletic wear. Polyester is a synthetic polymer derived from petroleum; nylon adds durability and stretch. Neither fiber inherently leaches hazardous chemicals under normal wear, though both can shed microplastics with repeated washing and wear. The absence of a disclosed water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish means no fluorinated chemicals were likely applied, a significant reduction in PFAS exposure compared to treated active wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Reebok has not publicly committed to detailed textile chemical transparency or restricted substance lists as comprehensively as some competitors (e.g., Patagonia, REI brands). The company has faced scrutiny on labor and environmental practices but no major recalls or chemical contamination incidents on record for apparel. Your information indicates silent stance on PFAS; this reflects broader industry reluctance rather than deliberate concealment, but limits assurance of supply-chain chemical controls.

How it compares in its category

Standard active tees span a wide range, untreated polyester blends (like this one) carry baseline microplastic and formaldehyde-resin risk; treated water-repellent coating versions add PFAS. Reebok's untreated approach represents lower concern than water-resistant alternatives but less transparent than certified low-impact brands. Price and durability are typical for mass-market athletic wear; chemical profile is neither exceptional nor alarming.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water and dry flat or low heat to minimize microplastic shedding and fiber degradation. Do not bleach, as this can weaken synthetic fibers and potentially mobilize residual dyes. Inspect seams and fabric annually; pilling or thinning suggests replacement to avoid fiber breakage. Air dry when possible; high heat from dryers accelerates synthetic fiber damage and may concentrate any trapped chemicals in the cloth.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reebok has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.