PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall43/ 100Poor
Saucony Men's Boston Woven Pants

Saucony · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Saucony Men's Boston Woven Pants

Good

Lower concern, bare woven textile without disclosed water treatment.

Verdict · SkipPolyester/nylon athletic blend with no major disclosed hazards; standard athletic wear safety profile; wash cold to minimize microfiber shed.

Standard woven athletic pants without waterproof or stain-resistant finish, so unlikely PFAS-treated. Saucony makes no PFAS claim, which is typical for basic sportswear.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

woven polyester/nylon blend athletic fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Woven synthetic athletic wear often receives formaldehyde-based finishing for shape retention. No disclosure from Saucony confirms or excludes this treatment on the Boston Woven line. Residual formaldehyde typically dissipates after 2-3 washes but may cause irritation on sensitive skin immediately after purchase.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

The pants are dyed polyester/nylon; azo dyes are standard in cost-effective athletic wear production. No restriction reports exist for Saucony, but public testing data is absent. Risk is low for most wearers but higher for individuals with dye sensitivities or those who sweat heavily in warm conditions.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is a common polyester polymerization catalyst; residual traces may remain in the finished fiber. Woven construction and athletic use context present negligible dermal contact risk compared to intimate apparel, but no manufacturer assay is publicly available.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding during washing

All synthetic textiles shed fibers; polyester/nylon blends contribute measurably to aquatic microplastic pollution. Woven construction sheds less than knits, but cold washing and lower frequency reduce shed rates by 20-40% per study consensus. This is a product-use hazard, not a manufacturing defect.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Athletic pants are not typically treated with halogenated flame retardants unless marketed specifically as performance safety apparel. No evidence suggests Saucony applies such treatments to this line. Standard polyester has moderate inherent flammability but does not meet furniture/mattress flame codes.

Source, EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These pants are a woven polyester/nylon blend, common in performance athletic wear for durability and moisture-wicking. Woven construction (versus knit) means lower microfiber shedding per wash cycle. The blend itself carries no inherent chemical hazard beyond standard synthetic textile processing; the actual risk depends on dyes, finishes, and how the fabric is treated during manufacturing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Saucony has not published detailed chemical disclosure statements or sustainability certifications for this specific product line. The brand does not widely advertise restricted substance compliance or third-party testing for this garment. No formal recalls or contamination incidents are on record for Saucony athletic apparel in recent years. Without certified testing data, compliance with formaldehyde, azo dye, or antimony limits cannot be verified from public sources.

How it compares in its category

Men's athletic pants in this price range typically use identical polyester/nylon blends with minimal differentiation in chemical risk. Brands like Nike, Adidas, and New Balance similarly lack granular disclosure for mid-tier athletic wear. Certified low-chemical alternatives (e.g., Patagonia, Icebreaker with transparency reports) command higher cost. For conventional athletic wear, Saucony sits at market average for transparency and hazard profile.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water to reduce microfiber release into waterways and minimize potential dye leaching. Avoid high heat (tumble dry low or air dry) to preserve the blend's elasticity and reduce off-gassing of any residual finishing chemicals. If you notice persistent odor, color bleeding, or skin irritation after first wash, discontinue use. Replace after 2-3 years of regular wear or when seams weaken; degraded fibers increase microplastic shedding.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Saucony has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.